AI
AI is a draft article and may contain little or no information on the topic but notes are available below.
This article will not be published on A Voice for Men or appear in random article selections. Wiki4Men is looking for trustworthy editors that can turn draft articles in to featured articles. Information on how to apply is on the Main Page.
In lieu of the article, the following is provided:
General Information
The main purpose of Wiki4Men is to provide a repository for information, studies, and research on men and boys and the broad range of issues affecting them, without feminist, misandric, gynocentric or woke bias. Wiki4Men also discusses issues of interest to MRAs, documents the evolution of the men's rights movement itself & misandry for posterity, and discusses issues of identity politics beyond the sphere of gender. The primary audience for Wiki4Men is MRAs, supporters of men's rights and the genuinely curious.
Starting in November 2023 topics that are more likely to be of interest to men are being added to the wiki.
The table below provides information on the number of articles in Wiki4Men.
| Category | Number |
|---|---|
| Biographies | 4,719 |
| Featured | 1,609 |
| Glossary | 470 |
| Unknown Persons | 266 |
| Information Technology | 42 |
| Draft Articles | 5,561 |
Featured articles may appear on A Voice for Men or other sites.
Wiki4Men is brought to you by A Voice for Men. More information on the wiki itself is available here. The Managing Editor is Robert Brockway.
In order to use the site, search for a term that interests you, choose from our Featured Articles or try a random article.
This site encourages publication of factual information about men and women and the cultural contexts in which they meet. It aims to be the keeper of rational and evidence-based conclusions, while rejecting popular forms of gender bigotry.
Due to licence compatibility articles may be imported from Wikipedia with appropriate attribution. These articles can then be corrected for woke bias and other problems. Generally only selected sections of articles are imported from Wikipedia as many Wikipedia articles are now so long that they obscure important information.
Wiki4Men rejects gynocentric and misandric narratives.
Draft Notes
Art created by AI is derivative. It cannot produce original content. If it could then it could produce content without being seeded, but it can't.
Some people counter that most humans, they assert, can't come up with original ideas.
This argument is non-sequitar. By definition, the humans producing original art *can* come up with new ideas
Some may argue that humans can't produce original content without learning language or how to use their hands but this argue is specious. The learning involved is different. AIs must be fed with content before they can produce output. Humans can produce visual artwork without ever having seen visual artwork. We know this because blind people have produced visual artwork.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E%C5%9Fref_Arma%C4%9Fan
Wide range of meanings of AI.
If AI (and automation more generally) was going to take everyone's jobs then people would be working shorter hours, not longer hours.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-28/productivity-commission-growth-report/105336036
While their study is no doubt detailed, the general scenario has been around for decades. The problem is that in reality it's all a bit more complicated. A lot of proponents of these sorts of ideas presume that AI will have the benefits of intelligence but without the problems. I think this is unlikely. Problems like laziness, procrastination and even mental illnesses may well be intrinsic to intelligence. Moreover some problems are actually more likely with high intelligence. Maybe we can't build a superbrain without it having crippling anxiety. Intelligence in our universe may well be self-limiting.
We keep seeing engineers talking about how AI will replace most jobs but do we see economists saying this? These people are talking outside of their professional are of expertise, they are doing so with authority and they are being publised by the MSM. Being an expert in AI is not the same thing as being an expert in the potential social and economic impacts of AI. These claims go against the Luddite fallacy.
If AI is going to lead to mass unemployment then we should see the unemployment rate start to rise and overt-ime (paid and unpaid) to fall. Over the last few decades unemployment has cycled while over-time has been trending up.
https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-artificial-intelligence-ai-plagiarizing/994299/21