Difference between revisions of "Sharon Irons"

From Wiki 4 Men
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
Dr Sharon Irons was accused by a former lover of [[spurgling]] sperm from a condom used during oral sex.<ref>https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2005-02-25-0502250262-story.html</ref> The victim, Dr. Richard O. Phillips, then sued for emotional distress. A court in Chicago ruled that he could not sue over the use of the sperm as it was considered by the court to be a gift.
+
Dr Sharon Irons was accused by a former lover of [[spurgling]] sperm from a condom used during oral sex.<ref>https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2005-02-25-0502250262-story.html</ref> A court in Chicago ruled that he could not sue over the use of the sperm as it was considered by the court to be a gift.
 
<ref>https://www.glennsacks.com/column.php?id=109</ref><ref>http://www.nbcnews.com/id/7024930/ns/health-sexual_health/t/sperm-gift-keeps-giving</ref><ref>https://rollingout.com/2014/02/04/woman-uses-sperm-oral-sex-get-pregnant-force-man-pay-child-support</ref><ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/fathers4equality/comments/1a2x6g/sperm_crimes/</ref>
 
<ref>https://www.glennsacks.com/column.php?id=109</ref><ref>http://www.nbcnews.com/id/7024930/ns/health-sexual_health/t/sperm-gift-keeps-giving</ref><ref>https://rollingout.com/2014/02/04/woman-uses-sperm-oral-sex-get-pregnant-force-man-pay-child-support</ref><ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/fathers4equality/comments/1a2x6g/sperm_crimes/</ref>
   
Despite having occurred many years ago the outcome of this court case is not clear from public records.
+
The victim, Dr. Richard O. Phillips, then sued for emotional distress. Despite having occurred many years ago the outcome of this court case is not clear from public records.
   
 
== See Also ==
 
== See Also ==

Revision as of 03:26, 1 January 2022

Dr Sharon Irons was accused by a former lover of spurgling sperm from a condom used during oral sex.[1] A court in Chicago ruled that he could not sue over the use of the sperm as it was considered by the court to be a gift. [2][3][4][5]

The victim, Dr. Richard O. Phillips, then sued for emotional distress. Despite having occurred many years ago the outcome of this court case is not clear from public records.

See Also

References