Difference between revisions of "Sharon Irons"

From Wiki 4 Men
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Dr Sharon Irons was accused by a former lover of [[spurgling]] sperm from a condom used during oral sex.<ref>https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2005-02-25-0502250262-story.html</ref> While the victim, Dr. Richard O. Phillips, was suing for emotional distress a court in Chicago ruled that he could not sue over the use of the sperm.<ref>http://www.nbcnews.com/id/7024930/ns/health-sexual_health/t/sperm-gift-keeps-giving</ref><ref>https://rollingout.com/2014/02/04/woman-uses-sperm-oral-sex-get-pregnant-force-man-pay-child-support</ref>
+
Dr [[Sharon Irons]] was accused by a former lover of [[spurgling]] sperm from a condom used during oral sex.<ref>https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2005-02-25-0502250262-story.html</ref> A court in Chicago ruled that the victim, Dr. Richard O. Phillips, could not sue over the use of the sperm as it was considered by the court to be a gift.
  +
<ref>https://www.glennsacks.com/column.php?id=109</ref><ref>http://www.nbcnews.com/id/7024930/ns/health-sexual_health/t/sperm-gift-keeps-giving</ref><ref>https://rollingout.com/2014/02/04/woman-uses-sperm-oral-sex-get-pregnant-force-man-pay-child-support</ref><ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/fathers4equality/comments/1a2x6g/sperm_crimes/</ref>
  +
  +
Dr Richard Phillips then sued for emotional distress. Despite having occurred many years ago the outcome of this court case is not clear from public records.
   
 
== See Also ==
 
== See Also ==
Line 7: Line 10:
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
   
  +
{{Bio}}
[[Category: Spurgling]]
 
  +
{{Featured}}
[[Category: United States]]
 
  +
{{Medicine}}
  +
{{Spurgling}}
  +
{{US}}

Latest revision as of 14:15, 12 December 2023

Dr Sharon Irons was accused by a former lover of spurgling sperm from a condom used during oral sex.[1] A court in Chicago ruled that the victim, Dr. Richard O. Phillips, could not sue over the use of the sperm as it was considered by the court to be a gift. [2][3][4][5]

Dr Richard Phillips then sued for emotional distress. Despite having occurred many years ago the outcome of this court case is not clear from public records.

See Also

References