Difference between revisions of "Dick is abundant and of low value"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ghost Marten (talk | contribs) (This shouldn't be an insult, it should be the #1 argument for why gynocentrism is real! Any feminist using this phrase is harming the credibility of her ideology.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Dick is abundant and low value]] is a phrase that is widely used by women to put down men. The phrase was popularised by [[feminist]] writer [[Alana Massey]] in her article ''The Dickonomics of Tinder''.<ref>https://medium.com/matter/the-dickonomics-of-tinder-b14956c0c2c7</ref> |
+ | [[Dick is abundant and low value]] is a phrase that is widely used by women to put down men. The phrase was popularised by [[feminist]] writer [[Alana Massey]] in her article ''The Dickonomics of Tinder''.<ref>https://medium.com/matter/the-dickonomics-of-tinder-b14956c0c2c7</ref> The statement itself is true and, in a way, the main reason for the existence of [[gynocentrism]]: those who produce the rarer (and thus more valuable) type of [[gamete]]s (eggs, produced by females) are the individuals that need extra protection in order to make the group survive - and those who don't produce them (namely, males) need to compensate for that by achieving other things. |
== External Links == |
== External Links == |
||
Revision as of 15:05, 6 November 2021
Dick is abundant and low value is a phrase that is widely used by women to put down men. The phrase was popularised by feminist writer Alana Massey in her article The Dickonomics of Tinder.[1] The statement itself is true and, in a way, the main reason for the existence of gynocentrism: those who produce the rarer (and thus more valuable) type of gametes (eggs, produced by females) are the individuals that need extra protection in order to make the group survive - and those who don't produce them (namely, males) need to compensate for that by achieving other things.