Difference between revisions of "Danna Pond"

From Wiki 4 Men
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 21: Line 21:
 
{{Female Supremacy}}
 
{{Female Supremacy}}
 
{{Misandry}}
 
{{Misandry}}
  +
{{Twitter}}
   
 
== References ==
 
== References ==

Revision as of 10:17, 23 September 2024

Danna Pond is a Canadian woman who has expressed misandric and female supremacist sentiments. She states that she is pro-trans implying that she does not view transwomen in the same negative light as men.

She styles herself as an indie rock artist but some sources indicate that she works in retail.

Danna Pond on X.[1][2]

Pond demonstrates misandric and female supremacist views:[3][4]

2024-09-23-193213 658x339 scrot.png

Later in the same conversation she reaffirms her female supremacist stance:[5][6][7][8]

2024-09-23-193337 658x486 scrot.png

And later still:[9][10]

2024-09-23-201101 657x326 scrot.png Misandry is the hatred of, pathological aversion to, or prejudice against men.[11] The first recorded use of the term dates from the 19th century.[12] At the present time misandry is widespread in Western society but may be in decline.

These days it seems you don't need to look far to see negativity focused at men. What is often known as casual misandry permeates western civilisation where many men and women commonly make negative statements about men without apparently regarding this as a problem or being challenged by anyone else present. This problem has steadily deteriorated and we have now reached the point that books with titles such as Are Men Necessary? When Sexes Collide[13] and The End of Men[14] can be published without significant objection from the wider community.

Negative and inaccurate portrayals of men and boys have permeated mainstream media and online knowledge repositories such as Wikipedia, where the bias is particularly evident. Wikipedia editors routinely write negative commentaries about men and Wikipedia admins protect those commentaries while censoring counter-narratives that might show less biased, more accurate information. This practice is reinforced by feminist editing gangs who congregate in regular 'edit-a-thons'[15][16][17] with the sole purpose of increasing feminist ideology within Wikipedia articles, and to censor male-positive discourse and research on men. In a nutshell those in control of Wikipedia have succeeded in deplatforming much reliable information about men and boys.

References