Difference between revisions of "Fact checker"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Robert Brockway moved page Fact checker to Fact checkers) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Fact |
+ | [[Fact checkers]] are third party individuals and organisations that are used to review content on [[Facebook]]. All fack-checkers are certified through the [[International Fact-Checking Network]].<ref>https://www.facebook.com/formedia/blog/third-party-fact-checking-how-it-works</ref> |
In a [https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/12/09/bombshell-in-court-filing-facebook-admits-fact-checks-are-nothing-more-than-opinion/ court filing] from November 21, 2021 on page 24 of 32, the following can be found: |
In a [https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/12/09/bombshell-in-court-filing-facebook-admits-fact-checks-are-nothing-more-than-opinion/ court filing] from November 21, 2021 on page 24 of 32, the following can be found: |
||
Revision as of 14:32, 16 May 2023
Fact checkers are third party individuals and organisations that are used to review content on Facebook. All fack-checkers are certified through the International Fact-Checking Network.[1]
In a court filing from November 21, 2021 on page 24 of 32, the following can be found:
- "First, Meta is alleged only to have superimposed a fact-check label on the Fire Video, describing Climate Feedback’s conclusion that the video was “missing context.” Stossel does not claim that label is actionably false—presumably because it is protected opinion. The conclusion that the video was “missing context” is necessarily a judgment call, one that is “not capable of verification or refutation by means of objective proof.”"
Thus Meta (i.e. Facebook) has openly admitted that so called "fact checks" are in fact opinion pieces. The name "fact checker" is thus wildly misleading.