Difference between revisions of "Misandry"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
In claiming that men are unnecessary Dowd is clearly exhibiting misandry. |
In claiming that men are unnecessary Dowd is clearly exhibiting misandry. |
||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | |||
== External Links == |
== External Links == |
||
| Line 15: | Line 19: | ||
* [http://www.singularity2050.com/2010/01/the-misandry-bubble/comments/page/8/ The Misandry Bubble] |
* [http://www.singularity2050.com/2010/01/the-misandry-bubble/comments/page/8/ The Misandry Bubble] |
||
* [http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/boys-men/201403/why-is-discussion-boys-and-men-opposed Why is discussion of boys and men opposed?] |
* [http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/boys-men/201403/why-is-discussion-boys-and-men-opposed Why is discussion of boys and men opposed?] |
||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
Revision as of 11:31, 2 April 2014
Misandry is the hatred of, pathological aversion to, or prejudice against men.[1] The first recorded use of the term dates from the 19th century.[2]
Examples
Maureen Dowd
Maureen Dowd is a columnist working for the New York Times. Dowd was recently quoted as saying:
So now that women don’t need men to reproduce and refinance, the question is, will we keep you around? And the answer is, ‘You know we need you in the way we need ice cream — you’ll be more ornamental.’
In claiming that men are unnecessary Dowd is clearly exhibiting misandry.
References
<references>