Sharon Irons: Difference between revisions

From Wiki 4 Men
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Dr Sharon Irons was accused by a former lover of [[spurgling]] sperm from a condom used during oral sex.<ref>https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2005-02-25-0502250262-story.html</ref> A court in Chicago ruled that he could not sue over the use of the sperm as it was considered by the court to be a gift.
Dr Sharon Irons was accused by a former lover of [[spurgling]] sperm from a condom used during oral sex.<ref>https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2005-02-25-0502250262-story.html</ref> A court in Chicago ruled that the victim, Dr. Richard O. Phillips, could not sue over the use of the sperm as it was considered by the court to be a gift.
<ref>https://www.glennsacks.com/column.php?id=109</ref><ref>http://www.nbcnews.com/id/7024930/ns/health-sexual_health/t/sperm-gift-keeps-giving</ref><ref>https://rollingout.com/2014/02/04/woman-uses-sperm-oral-sex-get-pregnant-force-man-pay-child-support</ref><ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/fathers4equality/comments/1a2x6g/sperm_crimes/</ref>
<ref>https://www.glennsacks.com/column.php?id=109</ref><ref>http://www.nbcnews.com/id/7024930/ns/health-sexual_health/t/sperm-gift-keeps-giving</ref><ref>https://rollingout.com/2014/02/04/woman-uses-sperm-oral-sex-get-pregnant-force-man-pay-child-support</ref><ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/fathers4equality/comments/1a2x6g/sperm_crimes/</ref>


The victim, Dr. Richard O. Phillips, then sued for emotional distress. Despite having occurred many years ago the outcome of this court case is not clear from public records.
Dr Richard Phillips then sued for emotional distress. Despite having occurred many years ago the outcome of this court case is not clear from public records.


== See Also ==
== See Also ==

Revision as of 00:01, 29 June 2022

Dr Sharon Irons was accused by a former lover of spurgling sperm from a condom used during oral sex.[1] A court in Chicago ruled that the victim, Dr. Richard O. Phillips, could not sue over the use of the sperm as it was considered by the court to be a gift. [2][3][4][5]

Dr Richard Phillips then sued for emotional distress. Despite having occurred many years ago the outcome of this court case is not clear from public records.

See Also

References