Difference between revisions of "Curfew for men"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
{{Curfew}} |
{{Curfew}} |
||
| + | {{Featured}} |
||
| + | |||
| + | == References == |
||
Latest revision as of 10:52, 19 May 2024
2016
Feminist Current called for a curfew for men.[1][2]
2018
2021
- https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/sarah-everard-missing-why-a-curfew-for-men-isnt-a-bad-idea/news-story/fc132409b1927ee4282b1801eb4a5eca
- https://news.sky.com/story/sarah-everard-green-partys-baroness-jones-suggests-6pm-curfew-for-men-12243194
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSJMlKxhXX8
A curfew for men would make women less safe, not more safe. This is because:
- Only law abiding men would obey it. A man intent on harming women would go out and do so, unopposed by any men.
- Most emergency services and after-hours workers are men. Having all these men home would increase risk for anyone on the streets.
2023
Jameela Jamil has called for two hours a day when only women are allowed outside.
2024 =
In May 2024 an article appeared on news.com.au suggesting that men should be prohibited from congregating in groups.[3][4]