AI

Art created by AI is derivative. It cannot produce original content. If it could then it could produce content without being seeded, but it can't.

Some people counter that most humans, they assert, can't come up with original ideas.

This argument is non-sequitar. By definition, the humans producing original art *can* come up with new ideas

Some may argue that humans can't produce original content without learning language or how to use their hands but this argue is specious. The learning involved is different. AIs must be fed with content before they can produce output. Humans can produce visual artwork without ever having seen visual artwork. We know this because blind people have produced visual artwork.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E%C5%9Fref_Arma%C4%9Fan

Wide range of meanings of AI.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-05-26/ai-threatened-jobs-are-mostly-held-by-women-study-shows

If AI (and automation more generally) was going to take everyone's jobs then people would be working shorter hours, not longer hours.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-28/productivity-commission-growth-report/105336036

This is a draft article and so will not be published on A Voice for Men or appear in random article selections. Wiki4Men is looking for trustworthy editors that can turn draft articles in to featured articles. Information on how to apply is on the Main Page.