Difference between revisions of "Male variability"

From Wiki 4 Men
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
** https://archive.is/uglXU
 
** https://archive.is/uglXU
 
*https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-handbook-of-the-international-psychology-of-women/sex-gender-and-intelligence/162037156813E98AE48EF68DB5FA184B
 
*https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-handbook-of-the-international-psychology-of-women/sex-gender-and-intelligence/162037156813E98AE48EF68DB5FA184B
  +
**https://archive.is/wip/pd29m
  +
** "no genetic evidence"
  +
*https://www.docdroid.net/JmkLaFI/jintell201504005-pdf
  +
**https://archive.is/wip/OwS1g
  +
  +
Often claimed to have been discredited.
  +
  +
Absolutely proven in certain areas: height weight, hand size.
  +
  +
Compelling evidence for personality.
  +
  +
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612964/
  +
  +
Very strong evidence for IQ, and this is true regardless of what IQ means.
  +
  +
Opponents are free claim it isn't true in a particular area, and in some cases this is likely true. Robert Brockway mentioned the possibility of counter-examples in this original article.
  +
  +
Male variability doesn't claim to be universally true just generally true.
  +
  +
[[Robert Brockway]] postulates that counter-examples exist and that, in particular, female sexual response is a counter-example. Women, on average, take longer to achieve orgasm than men, but more importantly there facility to orgasm varies significantly more. A man with a widely variant sexual response may ejaculate less frequently. This would be a negative selective pressure which would favour men with a more conventional sexual response. Thus natural selection keeps the male sexual response within narrow bounds, overcoming male variability. In contrast female sexual response is able to vary widely.
   
 
== See Also ==
 
== See Also ==

Latest revision as of 02:51, 22 September 2024

Often claimed to have been discredited.

Absolutely proven in certain areas: height weight, hand size.

Compelling evidence for personality.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612964/

Very strong evidence for IQ, and this is true regardless of what IQ means.

Opponents are free claim it isn't true in a particular area, and in some cases this is likely true. Robert Brockway mentioned the possibility of counter-examples in this original article.

Male variability doesn't claim to be universally true just generally true.

Robert Brockway postulates that counter-examples exist and that, in particular, female sexual response is a counter-example. Women, on average, take longer to achieve orgasm than men, but more importantly there facility to orgasm varies significantly more. A man with a widely variant sexual response may ejaculate less frequently. This would be a negative selective pressure which would favour men with a more conventional sexual response. Thus natural selection keeps the male sexual response within narrow bounds, overcoming male variability. In contrast female sexual response is able to vary widely.

See Also