Male variability

Male variability is a draft article and may contain little or no information on the topic but notes are available below.

This article will not be published on A Voice for Men or appear in random article selections. Wiki4Men is looking for trustworthy editors that can turn draft articles in to featured articles. Information on how to apply is on the Main Page.

In lieu of the article, the following is provided:

General Information

The main purpose of Wiki4Men is to provide a repository for information, studies, and research on men and boys and the broad range of issues affecting them, without feminist, misandric, gynocentric or woke bias. Wiki4Men also discusses issues of interest to MRAs, documents the evolution of the men's rights movement itself & misandry for posterity, and discusses issues of identity politics beyond the sphere of gender. The primary audience for Wiki4Men is MRAs, supporters of men's rights and the genuinely curious.

Starting in November 2023 topics that are more likely to be of interest to men are being added to the wiki.

The table below provides information on the number of articles in Wiki4Men.

Category	Number
Biographies	4,746
Featured	1,611
Glossary	472
Unknown Persons	272
Information Technology	42
Draft Articles	5,611

Featured articles may appear on A Voice for Men or other sites.

Wiki4Men is brought to you by A Voice for Men. More information on the wiki itself is available here. The Managing Editor is Robert Brockway.

In order to use the site, search for a term that interests you, choose from our Featured Articles or try a random article.

This site encourages publication of factual information about men and women and the cultural contexts in which they meet. It aims to be the keeper of rational and evidence-based conclusions, while rejecting popular forms of gender bigotry.

Due to licence compatibility articles may be imported from Wikipedia with appropriate attribution. These articles can then be corrected for woke bias and other problems. Generally only selected sections of articles are imported from Wikipedia as many Wikipedia articles are now so long that they obscure important information.

Wiki4Men rejects gynocentric and misandric narratives.

Draft Notes

• https://archive.is/fZmVv
• https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886913003036
• OP distribution by gender
• https://independent.co.uk/news/education/higher/dr-paul-irwing-there-are-twice-as-many-men-as-women-with-an-iq-of-120-plus-426321.html
• https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612964/
• https://www.forbes.com/sites/traversmark/2021/12/28/men-are-more-likely-to-behave-in-an-all-or-nothing-way-according-to-new-psychological-research/
• https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0092656612001730
• https://neurosciencenews.com/extreme-decisions-males-18535/
• https://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/from-sex-to-gender-modern-dismissal-of-biology/
  • https://archive.is/jfXz3
• https://avoiceformen.com/featured/men-are-exceptional-2/
• https://www.nature.com/articles/nature04966
  • https://archive.is/uglXU
• https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-handbook-of-the-international-psychology-of-women/sex-gender-and-intelligence/162037156813E98AE48EF68DB5FA184B
  • https://archive.is/wip/pd29m
  • "no genetic evidence"
• https://www.docdroid.net/JmkLaFI/jintell201504005-pdf
  • https://archive.is/wip/OwS1g

Often claimed to have been discredited.

Absolutely proven in certain areas: height weight, hand size.

Compelling evidence for personality.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612964/

Very strong evidence for IQ, and this is true regardless of what IQ means.

Opponents are free claim it isn't true in a particular area, and in some cases this is likely true. Robert Brockway mentioned the possibility of counter-examples in this original article.

Male variability doesn't claim to be universally true just generally true.

Robert Brockway postulates that counter-examples exist and that, in particular, female sexual response is a counter-example. Women, on average, take longer to achieve orgasm than men, but more importantly there facility to orgasm varies significantly more. A man with a widely variant sexual response may ejaculate less frequently. This would be a negative selective pressure which would favour men with a more conventional sexual response. Thus natural selection keeps the male sexual response within narrow bounds, overcoming male variability. In contrast female sexual response is able to vary widely.

This study claims that male reaction time is less variable - a possible counter example.

See Also

• Intelligence
• Parental investment theory