Difference between revisions of "Should women have the right to vote?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ghost Marten (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | * Some women have publically announced they will vote for Clinton in 2016 because she is a |
+ | * Some women have publically announced they will vote for Clinton in 2016 because she is a woman |
** This is exactly what some people argued when full enfranchisement for women was being considered |
** This is exactly what some people argued when full enfranchisement for women was being considered |
||
* Feminists are infantalising women |
* Feminists are infantalising women |
||
** eg, arguing that if a man and a woman are both drunk the man is the one that retains agency |
** eg, arguing that if a man and a woman are both drunk the man is the one that retains agency |
||
| − | ** That when boys have |
+ | ** That when boys have consensual sex with adult women it is the fault of the boy |
** US society supports this argument by requiring the boy to pay child support (including back payments) on turning 18 |
** US society supports this argument by requiring the boy to pay child support (including back payments) on turning 18 |
||
** We do not give infants the right to vote |
** We do not give infants the right to vote |
||
Latest revision as of 13:26, 2 March 2021
- Some women have publically announced they will vote for Clinton in 2016 because she is a woman
- This is exactly what some people argued when full enfranchisement for women was being considered
- Feminists are infantalising women
- eg, arguing that if a man and a woman are both drunk the man is the one that retains agency
- That when boys have consensual sex with adult women it is the fault of the boy
- US society supports this argument by requiring the boy to pay child support (including back payments) on turning 18
- We do not give infants the right to vote