Difference between revisions of "Curfew for men"

Latest revision as of 10:52, 19 May 2024

Feminist Current called for a curfew for men.^[1]^[2]

A curfew for men would make women less safe, not more safe. This is because:

Only law abiding men would obey it. A man intent on harming women would go out and do so, unopposed by any men.
Most emergency services and after-hours workers are men. Having all these men home would increase risk for anyone on the streets.

Jameela Jamil has called for two hours a day when only women are allowed outside.

In May 2024 an article appeared on news.com.au suggesting that men should be prohibited from congregating in groups.^[3]^[4]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+== 2016 ==
+[[Feminist Current]] called for a curfew for men.<ref>https://www.feministcurrent.com/2016/01/07/its-time-to-consider-a-curfew-for-men/</ref><ref>https://archive.is/YsKHG</ref>
 == 2018 ==
@@ Line 9: / Line 13: @@
 *https://news.sky.com/story/sarah-everard-green-partys-baroness-jones-suggests-6pm-curfew-for-men-12243194
 *https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSJMlKxhXX8
+A curfew for men would make women less safe, not more safe.  This is because:
+* Only law abiding men would obey it.  A man intent on harming women would go out and do so, unopposed by any men.
+* Most emergency services and after-hours workers are men.  Having all these men home would increase risk for anyone on the streets.
+== 2023 ==
+[[Jameela Jamil]] has called for two hours a day when only women are allowed outside.
+== 2024 ===
+In May 2024 an article appeared on [[news.com.au]] suggesting that men should be prohibited from congregating in groups.<ref>https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/is-it-time-to-stop-men-congregating-in-groups/news-story/0fbbc08b796d677fb0891024f60d74da</ref><ref>https://archive.is/mET8F</ref>
+{{Curfew}}
+{{Featured}}
+== References ==