Difference between revisions of "Glass cliff hypothesis"

From Wiki 4 Men
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Robert Brockway moved page Bankruptcy to Glass cliff hypothesis)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
The [[glass cliff]] is an alleged phenomenon where, it is claimed, women are more likely to be hired in to senior leadership roles when a company was already in financial difficulties. Proponents of this idea claim that women are scape-goated for problems initiated by men.<ref>https://www.vox.com/2018/10/31/17960156/what-is-the-glass-cliff-women-ceos</ref><ref>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2022/08/19/glass-cliffs-firms-appoint-female-executives-in-times-of-crisis-as-a-signal-of-change-to-investors/</ref><ref>https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/when-women-leaders-appointed-once-company-screwed-glass-agrawal/</ref>
https://www.vox.com/2018/10/31/17960156/what-is-the-glass-cliff-women-ceos
 
   
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2022/08/19/glass-cliffs-firms-appoint-female-executives-in-times-of-crisis-as-a-signal-of-change-to-investors/
+
Even if true this behaviour could indicate a tendency for women to be regarded as more likely to save the company. Proponents of tjhe glass cliff are unaware of, or ignore, this possibility. Instead they prefer to regard it as a form of [[misogyny]].<ref>https://www.vox.com/2018/10/31/17960156/what-is-the-glass-cliff-women-ceos</ref><ref>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2022/08/19/glass-cliffs-firms-appoint-female-executives-in-times-of-crisis-as-a-signal-of-change-to-investors/</ref><ref>https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/when-women-leaders-appointed-once-company-screwed-glass-agrawal/</ref>
   
{{Draft}}
+
{{Featured}}
 
{{Finance}}
 
{{Finance}}

Revision as of 14:00, 21 April 2024

The glass cliff is an alleged phenomenon where, it is claimed, women are more likely to be hired in to senior leadership roles when a company was already in financial difficulties. Proponents of this idea claim that women are scape-goated for problems initiated by men.[1][2][3]

Even if true this behaviour could indicate a tendency for women to be regarded as more likely to save the company. Proponents of tjhe glass cliff are unaware of, or ignore, this possibility. Instead they prefer to regard it as a form of misogyny.[4][5][6]