Difference between revisions of "Manel"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Manel is a [[misandric]] term applied to a panel of speakers or presenters which consists entirely of men. The implication is that a panel is deficient if it does not contain a woman, because [[diversity]]. As is typical of other such terms used by feminists the merit of the speakers is ignored. |
Manel is a [[misandric]] term applied to a panel of speakers or presenters which consists entirely of men. The implication is that a panel is deficient if it does not contain a woman, because [[diversity]]. As is typical of other such terms used by feminists the merit of the speakers is ignored. |
||
| − | Notably the 2013 Monk Debate entitled [[Men are Obsolete (Munk debate)|Men are Obsolete]] |
+ | Notably in the the 2013 Monk Debate entitled [[Men are Obsolete (Munk debate)|Men are Obsolete]] both teams were comprised entirely of women. |
== External Links == |
== External Links == |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*[https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/manel Definition of manel at MacMillan Dictionary] |
*[https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/manel Definition of manel at MacMillan Dictionary] |
||
| + | {{Featured}} |
||
| − | [[Category:Misandry]] |
||
| + | {{Glossary}} |
||
| − | [[Category:Featured Articles]] |
||
| + | {{Misandry}} |
||
| − | [[Category:Glossary]] |
||
Latest revision as of 13:14, 18 February 2024
Manel is a misandric term applied to a panel of speakers or presenters which consists entirely of men. The implication is that a panel is deficient if it does not contain a woman, because diversity. As is typical of other such terms used by feminists the merit of the speakers is ignored.
Notably in the the 2013 Monk Debate entitled Men are Obsolete both teams were comprised entirely of women.