Difference between revisions of "Separatist feminism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Robert Brockway moved page Separatist feminist to Separatist feminism) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If the claims made by feminists about men, including that they have [[The Patriarchy|systematically]] oppressed women throughout history using violence, are true then separatism would be a viable option. If men have really acted this way towards women over thousands of years then it would be reasonable to conclude that this is intrinsic to the nature of men. Women believing this would do well to create a society without men. They could have women fulfil all of the roles in society, even the dangerous and dirty ones. |
If the claims made by feminists about men, including that they have [[The Patriarchy|systematically]] oppressed women throughout history using violence, are true then separatism would be a viable option. If men have really acted this way towards women over thousands of years then it would be reasonable to conclude that this is intrinsic to the nature of men. Women believing this would do well to create a society without men. They could have women fulfil all of the roles in society, even the dangerous and dirty ones. |
||
− | == |
+ | == See Also == |
+ | *[[Amazon Acres]] |
||
− | *[https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07-30/history-of-amazon-acres-nsw-community-female-only/11095974 Amazon Acres] |
||
[[Category:Featured Articles]] |
[[Category:Featured Articles]] |
Revision as of 06:31, 16 February 2020
If the claims made by feminists about men, including that they have systematically oppressed women throughout history using violence, are true then separatism would be a viable option. If men have really acted this way towards women over thousands of years then it would be reasonable to conclude that this is intrinsic to the nature of men. Women believing this would do well to create a society without men. They could have women fulfil all of the roles in society, even the dangerous and dirty ones.