Difference between revisions of "Female rulers"
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* https://qz.com/967895/throughout-history-women-rulers-were-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men/ |
* https://qz.com/967895/throughout-history-women-rulers-were-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men/ |
||
* https://qz.com/1115269/would-the-world-be-more-peaceful-if-there-were-more-women-leaders/ |
* https://qz.com/1115269/would-the-world-be-more-peaceful-if-there-were-more-women-leaders/ |
||
| − | * https://www. |
+ | * https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-general/warlike-queens-0012861 |
[[File:Queens Oct2015.pdf]] |
[[File:Queens Oct2015.pdf]] |
||
Revision as of 14:12, 10 May 2023
Despite widely held opinions to the contrary, there is growing evidence that female leaders are more likely to start and continue wars than male leaders.
Medieveal Europe
A major study on European monarchs found that Queens Regnant were more likely than Kings to start new wars and to continue the wars of their predecessors.
- http://odube.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Queens_Oct2015.pdf
- http://www.psmag.com/politics-and-law/queens-on-attack
- http://mentalfloss.com/article/74643/europes-queens-were-more-likely-go-war-its-kings
- https://www.nber.org/papers/w23337.pdf
- https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-7667033/Queens-gone-war-kings-centuries-historic-study-finds.html
- https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4454964/Female-rulers-27-likely-wage-WAR-males.html
- https://qz.com/967895/throughout-history-women-rulers-were-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men/
- https://qz.com/1115269/would-the-world-be-more-peaceful-if-there-were-more-women-leaders/
- https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-general/warlike-queens-0012861
Modern female leaders: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03050629.2019.1683008
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09636412.2020.1763450
https://www.reddit.com/r/unpopularopinion/comments/8k6lpq/women_as_a_voting_group_are_far_more/
Modern World
The book Why Leaders Fight includes an analysis of world leaders from 1875 to 2004 and examines whether gender has an impact on the likelihood of engaging in armed conflict. The authors found that 30% of men and 36% of women engaged in at least one armed conflict during their time in power.[1]
Conflict
Consistent with the literature on stereotypes, we find that increases in women’s legislative representation decreases conflict behavior and defense spending, while the presence of women executives increases both.[2][3]
...we find that polities ruled by queens were 27% more likely to participate in inter-state conflicts, compared to polities ruled by kings.[4]
List
- Merneith (Africa, 13th century BCE)
- Hatshepsut (Africa, 1508-1458 BCE)
- Artemisia I of Caria (Asia, 5th century BCE)
- Olympias (Europe, 375-316 BCE)
- Cleopatra Thea (Africa, 164-121 BCE)
- Cleopatra VII (Africa, 69-30 BCE)
- Boudica (Europe, 20-60 CE)
- Zenobia (West Asia, 240-275 CE)
- Empress Suiko (East Asia, 554-628 CE)
- Empress Wu Zetian (East Asia, 625-705 CE)
- Irene of Athens (West Asia, 752-803 CE)
- Theophano (West Asia, 943-969 CE)
- Theophano (Europe, 956-991 CE)
- Margaret of Austria (Europe, 1480-1530 CE)
- Catherine of Austria (Europe, 1507-1578 CE)
- Mary I (Europe, 1516-1558 CE)
- Elizabeth I (Europe, 1533-1603 CE)
- Joan of Austria (Europe, 1535-1573 CE)
- Mary Queen of Scots (Europe, 1542-1587 CE)
- Catherine the Great (Europe, 1729-1796 CE)
Societies from the Americas are lacking from the list above due to lack of historical records. It is likely that ancient societies in the Americas had similar proportions of female rulers. Female rulers, while a minority, were common around the world.