Defund the police: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''police abolition movement''', better known as [[defund the police]] was a political movement, mostly active in the United States, that advocated replacing policing with other systems of public safety. As of September 2024 this movement is dead. |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defund_the_police |
|||
The English word [[defund]] means to eliminate funding. Many proponents of [[defund the police]] actually wanted funding reduced and redirected while some actually wanted to abolish policing entirely. Withour further explanation it was impossible to know which outcome particular activists were aiming for. |
|||
== See Also == |
|||
Police abolitionists believe that policing, as a system, is inherently flawed and cannot be reformed — a view that rejects the ideology of police reformists. While reformists seek to address the ways in which policing occurs, abolitionists seek to transform policing altogether through a process of disbanding, disempowering, and disarming the police. Abolitionists argue that the institution of policing is deeply rooted in a history of white supremacy and settler colonialism and that it is inseparable from a pre-existing racial capitalist order, and thus believe a reformist approach to policing will always fail |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Police abolition is a process that requires communities to create alternatives to policing, such as Mobile Crisis Teams and Community accountability. This process involves the deconstruction of the preconceived understandings of policing and resisting co-option by reformists. It also involves engaging in and supporting practices that reduce police power and legitimacy, such as defunding the police. |
|||
{{Draft}} |
|||
In the George Floyd protests and riots, [[Black Lives Matter]] and other activists used the phrase "defund the police". The defunding movement advocates reducing police department budgets or the delegation of certain police responsibilities to other organizations. Some activists have proposed the diversion of police funds to social services, such as youth or housing services. Despite exceptions, advocates for defunding the police rarely call for outright abolition of police. |
|||
Police abolition has been criticized by many sociologists, criminologists, journalists, and politicians. |
|||
{{H2|Media}} |
|||
=== Yes, Prime Minister === |
|||
{{Yes, Prime Minister}} |
|||
{{H2|Proponents}} |
|||
=== Nayuka Gorrie === |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
=== Mona Eltahawy === |
|||
{{Mona Eltahawy Australia}} |
|||
{{Featured}} |
|||
{{Police}} |
|||
{{Q+A}} |
{{Q+A}} |
||
{{WP}} |
{{WP}} |
||
{{References}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 06:47, 29 March 2026
The police abolition movement, better known as defund the police was a political movement, mostly active in the United States, that advocated replacing policing with other systems of public safety. As of September 2024 this movement is dead.
The English word defund means to eliminate funding. Many proponents of defund the police actually wanted funding reduced and redirected while some actually wanted to abolish policing entirely. Withour further explanation it was impossible to know which outcome particular activists were aiming for.
Police abolitionists believe that policing, as a system, is inherently flawed and cannot be reformed — a view that rejects the ideology of police reformists. While reformists seek to address the ways in which policing occurs, abolitionists seek to transform policing altogether through a process of disbanding, disempowering, and disarming the police. Abolitionists argue that the institution of policing is deeply rooted in a history of white supremacy and settler colonialism and that it is inseparable from a pre-existing racial capitalist order, and thus believe a reformist approach to policing will always fail
Police abolition is a process that requires communities to create alternatives to policing, such as Mobile Crisis Teams and Community accountability. This process involves the deconstruction of the preconceived understandings of policing and resisting co-option by reformists. It also involves engaging in and supporting practices that reduce police power and legitimacy, such as defunding the police.
In the George Floyd protests and riots, Black Lives Matter and other activists used the phrase "defund the police". The defunding movement advocates reducing police department budgets or the delegation of certain police responsibilities to other organizations. Some activists have proposed the diversion of police funds to social services, such as youth or housing services. Despite exceptions, advocates for defunding the police rarely call for outright abolition of police.
Police abolition has been criticized by many sociologists, criminologists, journalists, and politicians.
Media
Yes, Prime Minister
Power to the People is an episode of British political satire sitcom Yes, Prime Minister. The episode is Episode 5 of Season 2 and was first broadcast on 7 January 1988.
The episode includes a character named Agnes Moorhead. Moorhead is a progressive activist who advocates for abolition of the police, demonstrating that this idea had currency by the 1980s.
Proponents
Nayuka Gorrie

Nayuka Gorrie (born 1990), formerly Natalie Gorrie, is an Australian writer, actor, screenwriter, and activist.
Gorrie considers herself non-binary and uses the pronouns they/them.[1]
She is known for writing and performing in the third and fourth seasons of Black Comedy, for exploring their Black queer identity, feminist politics, and social commentary.
Gorrie appeared on the 4 November 2019 episode of Q&A. This episode was held in conjunction with the feminist Broadside conference. The panel for this episode of Q&A was made up entirely of feminists who were speaking at the conference.[2]
During the episode Gorrie advocated for the complete abolition of police.[3][4]
Her mother, Veronica Gorrie, is a former police officer.[5][6]
Mona Eltahawy
Mona Eltahawy appeared on the Australian TV show Q&A on November 4, 2019 which was held in conjunction with the feminist Broadside conference.[7] During the show, she promoted violence against men and endorsed Nayuka Gorrie advocating for the complete abolition of police.[8][9] The episode was subsequently taken down by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation although it remains widely available online. Eltahawy opposed the removal of the episode and has subsequently indicated that she stands by the positions that she expressed on the programme.
Wikipedia
This article contains information imported from the English Wikipedia. In most cases the page history will have details. If you need information on the importation and have difficulty obtaining it please contact the site administrators.
Wikipedia shows a strong woke bias. Text copied over from Wikipedia can be corrected and improved.
References
- ↑ https://photo.org.au/artists/nayuka-gorrie-2/
- ↑ https://www.abc.net.au/qanda/2019-04-11/11646878
- ↑ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DF-RjItEXYk&t=2468s
- ↑ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DF-RjItEXYk&t=1130s
- ↑ https://www.sbs.com.au/voices/article/indigenous-former-police-officer-veronica-gorrie-writes-of-trauma-and-racism/r2151exwh
- ↑ https://archive.is/wip/8bV1G
- ↑ https://www.abc.net.au/qanda/2019-04-11/11646878
- ↑ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DF-RjItEXYk&t=2468s
- ↑ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DF-RjItEXYk&t=1130s