Difference between revisions of "Paternity fraud"

From Wiki 4 Men
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
* https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/07/who-s-your-daddy/305969/
 
* https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/07/who-s-your-daddy/305969/
 
* https://familylawexpress.com.au/family-law-decisions/appeal/magill-v-magill-2006-hca-51-2006-231-alr-277-2006-81-aljr-254/ - no recourse under Australian law.
 
* https://familylawexpress.com.au/family-law-decisions/appeal/magill-v-magill-2006-hca-51-2006-231-alr-277-2006-81-aljr-254/ - no recourse under Australian law.
  +
* https://www.tennessean.com/story/opinion/2022/03/29/new-proposed-bill-protects-tennessees-parents-paternity-fraud/7200208001/
  +
* https://www.fox13memphis.com/news/tennessee-bill-would-make-it-illegal-to-falsely-accuse-someone-of-being-babys-father/article_851cb26a-c7fd-11ed-bbbe-2344cf773e0a.htm
  +
  +
Genealogists assume 5% rate.
  +
  +
{{Draft}}

Latest revision as of 14:54, 15 March 2024