Difference between revisions of "Paternity fraud"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/07/who-s-your-daddy/305969/ |
* https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/07/who-s-your-daddy/305969/ |
||
* https://familylawexpress.com.au/family-law-decisions/appeal/magill-v-magill-2006-hca-51-2006-231-alr-277-2006-81-aljr-254/ - no recourse under Australian law. |
* https://familylawexpress.com.au/family-law-decisions/appeal/magill-v-magill-2006-hca-51-2006-231-alr-277-2006-81-aljr-254/ - no recourse under Australian law. |
||
| + | * https://www.tennessean.com/story/opinion/2022/03/29/new-proposed-bill-protects-tennessees-parents-paternity-fraud/7200208001/ |
||
Revision as of 02:00, 14 August 2023
- https://jezebel.com/5349395/are-paternity-tests-anti-feminist
- https://isogg.org/wiki/Non-paternity_event
- http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/06/the-paternity-myth-the-rarity-of-cuckoldry
- Table 3 suggests it is actually alarmingly common
- https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/07/who-s-your-daddy/305969/
- https://familylawexpress.com.au/family-law-decisions/appeal/magill-v-magill-2006-hca-51-2006-231-alr-277-2006-81-aljr-254/ - no recourse under Australian law.
- https://www.tennessean.com/story/opinion/2022/03/29/new-proposed-bill-protects-tennessees-parents-paternity-fraud/7200208001/