Difference between revisions of "Identity politics"

From Wiki 4 Men
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
One of the greatest misunderstandings about the men's rights movement and anti-feminism is that they in any way involve identity politics. Merely identifying with a group does not imply identity politics.
 
One of the greatest misunderstandings about the men's rights movement and anti-feminism is that they in any way involve identity politics. Merely identifying with a group does not imply identity politics.
   
  +
Merely seeking to address the problems faced by a particular group does not imply identity politics.
It's become very popular lately to reject 'labels' but the truth is that group identity is one of the most powerful tools that we as a species have. Human societies were built on group identity long before the written word. Yes, even free thinkers can identify with a group. The use of the term group identity still doesn't imply identity politics.
 
   
 
The Oxford Dictionary defines identity politics as:
The key difference is that identity politics involves grouping on the basis of certain characteristics with which people identify. These characteristics tend to be related to a person's background or origins. Identity politics is at its heard exclusionary.
 
 
MRAs do not exclude people on the basis of their characteristics. Every major men's rights organisation has women in leadership roles for example. This is because those women were willing and able to fill those positions. Anyone who wants to help MRAs address the problems facing men and boys is welcome. Doesn't matter if they are male, female, intersex, whatever.
 
 
Compare to feminist groups. Many exclude men from leadership roles and some exclude men entirely - calling them 'allies'. Some don't even want male allies. That's identity politics.
 
 
The Oxford Directionary defines identity politics as:
 
   
 
<pre>
 
<pre>
 
A tendency for people of a particular religion, race, social background, etc., to form exclusive political alliances, moving away from traditional broad-based party politics.
 
A tendency for people of a particular religion, race, social background, etc., to form exclusive political alliances, moving away from traditional broad-based party politics.
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
  +
 
Every major men's rights organisation has women in leadership roles. This is because those women were willing and able to fill those positions. Anyone who wants to help MRAs address the problems facing men and boys is welcome. Doesn't matter if they are male, female, intersex, whatever.
  +
 
Compare to feminist groups. Many exclude men from leadership roles and some exclude men entirely - calling them 'allies'. Some don't even want male allies. That's identity politics.

Revision as of 17:19, 8 September 2018

One of the greatest misunderstandings about the men's rights movement and anti-feminism is that they in any way involve identity politics. Merely identifying with a group does not imply identity politics.

Merely seeking to address the problems faced by a particular group does not imply identity politics.

The Oxford Dictionary defines identity politics as:

A tendency for people of a particular religion, race, social background, etc., to form exclusive political alliances, moving away from traditional broad-based party politics.

Every major men's rights organisation has women in leadership roles. This is because those women were willing and able to fill those positions. Anyone who wants to help MRAs address the problems facing men and boys is welcome. Doesn't matter if they are male, female, intersex, whatever.

Compare to feminist groups. Many exclude men from leadership roles and some exclude men entirely - calling them 'allies'. Some don't even want male allies. That's identity politics.