Difference between revisions of "Feminist hypocricy"

From Wiki 4 Men
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Unfortunately modern feminism is hypocritical in many ways. This page lists some of the hypocracies maintained by feminists.
+
Unfortunately, modern feminism is hypocritical in many ways. This page lists some of the hypocrisies maintained by feminists.
   
 
== Exclusivity ==
 
== Exclusivity ==
   
Feminists argue that men should not have exclusive places but that women may not. Recently the University of Sydney union voted against accepting ''BroSoc'' as a union affiliated club.<ref>http://honisoit.com/2014/09/board-blocks-brosoc/</ref><ref>http://www.altmedia.net.au/sydney-university-board-blocks-mens-society/98435</ref> This organisation would have run a ''men's shed'' on campus. In contract the University of Sydney has several women only organisation.
+
Feminists argue that men should not have exclusive places but that women may not. Recently the University of Sydney union voted against accepting ''BroSoc'' as a union affiliated club.<ref>http://honisoit.com/2014/09/board-blocks-brosoc/</ref><ref>http://www.altmedia.net.au/sydney-university-board-blocks-mens-society/98435</ref> This organisation would have run a ''men's shed'' on campus. In contrast the University of Sydney has several women-only organisations.
 
 
 
   
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
<references>
 

Latest revision as of 12:12, 5 May 2020

Unfortunately, modern feminism is hypocritical in many ways. This page lists some of the hypocrisies maintained by feminists.

Exclusivity

Feminists argue that men should not have exclusive places but that women may not. Recently the University of Sydney union voted against accepting BroSoc as a union affiliated club.[1][2] This organisation would have run a men's shed on campus. In contrast the University of Sydney has several women-only organisations.

References