Difference between revisions of "Edit-a-thons"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Negative and inaccurate portrayals of men and boys have permeated mainstream media and online knowledge repositories such as Wikipedia, where the bias is particularly evident. Wikipedia editors routinely write negative commentaries about men and Wikipedia admins protect those commentaries while censoring counter-narratives that might show less biased, more accurate information. |
Negative and inaccurate portrayals of men and boys have permeated mainstream media and online knowledge repositories such as Wikipedia, where the bias is particularly evident. Wikipedia editors routinely write negative commentaries about men and Wikipedia admins protect those commentaries while censoring counter-narratives that might show less biased, more accurate information. |
||
| − | This practice is reinforced by feminists who regularly participate in [[edit-a-thons]]. Feminist university professors openly offer credit for editing Wikipedia<ref>Katherine Timpf., [https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=5028 ‘Storming Wikipedia’: Colleges offer credit to students who enter ‘feminist thinking’ into Wikipedia]. Campus Reform (2013)</ref><ref> [https://www.foxnews.com/tech/wikistorming-colleges-offer-credit-to-inject-feminism-into-wikipedia Wikistorming: Colleges offer credit to inject feminism into Wikipedia]. Fox News (2013) |
+ | This practice is reinforced by feminists who regularly participate in [[edit-a-thons]]. Feminist university professors openly offer credit for editing Wikipedia<ref>Katherine Timpf., [https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=5028 ‘Storming Wikipedia’: Colleges offer credit to students who enter ‘feminist thinking’ into Wikipedia]. Campus Reform (2013)</ref><ref> [https://www.foxnews.com/tech/wikistorming-colleges-offer-credit-to-inject-feminism-into-wikipedia Wikistorming: Colleges offer credit to inject feminism into Wikipedia]. Fox News (2013)</ref><ref>https://magenta.as/this-is-what-happens-at-a-feminist-edit-a-thon-for-wikipedia-15baea4ac8cd</ref> with the sole purpose of increasing feminist ideology within Wikipedia articles, and to censor male-positive discourse and research on men. |
Those in control of Wikipedia have succeeded in deplatforming much reliable information about men and boys. |
Those in control of Wikipedia have succeeded in deplatforming much reliable information about men and boys. |
||
Revision as of 15:59, 4 October 2021
Negative and inaccurate portrayals of men and boys have permeated mainstream media and online knowledge repositories such as Wikipedia, where the bias is particularly evident. Wikipedia editors routinely write negative commentaries about men and Wikipedia admins protect those commentaries while censoring counter-narratives that might show less biased, more accurate information.
This practice is reinforced by feminists who regularly participate in edit-a-thons. Feminist university professors openly offer credit for editing Wikipedia[1][2][3] with the sole purpose of increasing feminist ideology within Wikipedia articles, and to censor male-positive discourse and research on men.
Those in control of Wikipedia have succeeded in deplatforming much reliable information about men and boys.
References
- ↑ Katherine Timpf., ‘Storming Wikipedia’: Colleges offer credit to students who enter ‘feminist thinking’ into Wikipedia. Campus Reform (2013)
- ↑ Wikistorming: Colleges offer credit to inject feminism into Wikipedia. Fox News (2013)
- ↑ https://magenta.as/this-is-what-happens-at-a-feminist-edit-a-thon-for-wikipedia-15baea4ac8cd