Feminist hypocricy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
m Robert Brockway moved page Feminist hypocracy to Feminist hypocricy |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Feminists argue that men should not have exclusive places but that women may not. Recently the University of Sydney union voted against accepting ''BroSoc'' as a union affiliated club.<ref>http://honisoit.com/2014/09/board-blocks-brosoc/</ref><ref>http://www.altmedia.net.au/sydney-university-board-blocks-mens-society/98435</ref> This organisation would have run a ''men's shed'' on campus. In contract the University of Sydney has several women only organisation. |
Feminists argue that men should not have exclusive places but that women may not. Recently the University of Sydney union voted against accepting ''BroSoc'' as a union affiliated club.<ref>http://honisoit.com/2014/09/board-blocks-brosoc/</ref><ref>http://www.altmedia.net.au/sydney-university-board-blocks-mens-society/98435</ref> This organisation would have run a ''men's shed'' on campus. In contract the University of Sydney has several women only organisation. |
||
== References == |
== References == |
||
<references> |
|||
Revision as of 12:12, 5 May 2020
Unfortunately modern feminism is hypocritical in many ways. This page lists some of the hypocracies maintained by feminists.
Exclusivity
Feminists argue that men should not have exclusive places but that women may not. Recently the University of Sydney union voted against accepting BroSoc as a union affiliated club.[1][2] This organisation would have run a men's shed on campus. In contract the University of Sydney has several women only organisation.