Marital debt: Difference between revisions

From Wiki 4 Men
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Contrary to claims of [[The Patriarchy]] leaders in the Christian Church in the Middle Ages postulated that a man could give his wife an orgasm and avoid orgasming himself:

<blockquote>
<blockquote>
Returning the debt to one's wife is nothing more than making your body available to
Returning the debt to one's wife is nothing more than making your body available to
Line 5: Line 7:
the debt to my wife and wait in such a way until she satisfies her pleasure . . . . I can,
the debt to my wife and wait in such a way until she satisfies her pleasure . . . . I can,
if I wish, withdraw, not satisfying my pleasure, free of all sin, and not emitting my
if I wish, withdraw, not satisfying my pleasure, free of all sin, and not emitting my
seed of propagation.<ref>https://resources.saylor.org/wwwresources/archived/site/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/The-Conjugal-Debt-and-Medieval-Canon-Law.pdf</ref>
seed of propagation.
</blockquote>
</blockquote>



Revision as of 12:19, 4 December 2019

Contrary to claims of The Patriarchy leaders in the Christian Church in the Middle Ages postulated that a man could give his wife an orgasm and avoid orgasming himself:

Returning the debt to one's wife is nothing more than making your body available to her. Hence, one often renders the debt to his wife in such a way that he does not satisfy his pleasure, and conversely. Therefore, in the aforesaid case, I can so render the debt to my wife and wait in such a way until she satisfies her pleasure . . . . I can, if I wish, withdraw, not satisfying my pleasure, free of all sin, and not emitting my seed of propagation.[1]



External Links