Difference between revisions of "Advocacy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
** If they could attack the argument on merit they would be better off doing so |
** If they could attack the argument on merit they would be better off doing so |
||
** Better to say nothing than to get personal |
** Better to say nothing than to get personal |
||
+ | * If you say that someone is wrong you need to back it up, ideally with multiple sources |
||
+ | * If you are expressing an opinion make it clear that it is an opinion |
Revision as of 09:01, 8 January 2014
- Don't bother debating with feminists
- They may or may not be open to alternative viewpoints but it doesn't really matter
- Bypass them and advocate to men and politicians
- Men, because they are the ones at risk now
- Politicians because they are the ones who can change the laws
- Always take the high ground when debating
- Stick to the facts
- If you can't back it up I don't say it
- Never ever make ad hominem attacks
- When someone makes an ad hominem attack they are conceding their opponent's point
- If they could attack the argument on merit they would be better off doing so
- Better to say nothing than to get personal
- If you say that someone is wrong you need to back it up, ideally with multiple sources
- If you are expressing an opinion make it clear that it is an opinion