Difference between revisions of "Women's spaces"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A high proportion of human societies have chosen some form of '''gender segregation''' and it is one of the biggest criticisms westerners often level at non-western societies. In recent years there is evidence that western civilisation may be adopting increased gender segregation. |
A high proportion of human societies have chosen some form of '''gender segregation''' and it is one of the biggest criticisms westerners often level at non-western societies. In recent years there is evidence that western civilisation may be adopting increased gender segregation. |
||
| − | A lot of gender segregation in western countries is being driven by women who state that they often feel threatened by men, sometimes merely by their presence. Women continue to form many women-only organisations in western countries ( |
+ | A lot of gender segregation in western countries is being driven by women who state that they often feel threatened by men, sometimes merely by their presence. Women continue to form many women-only organisations in western countries (such as gyms). This raises the interesting question about whether it was women who drove segregation in other societies. This would be interesting considering that gender segregation in non-western countries today is often claimed as principally disadvantaging women. |
Feminists assert that men interrupt women more than women interrupt men in conversation. This notion is in dispute but if it is believed by women to be true then it may follow that women would prefer to talk to other women than men, which would further support the notion that women may naturally wish to increase gender segregation. |
Feminists assert that men interrupt women more than women interrupt men in conversation. This notion is in dispute but if it is believed by women to be true then it may follow that women would prefer to talk to other women than men, which would further support the notion that women may naturally wish to increase gender segregation. |
||
Revision as of 13:19, 28 March 2014
A high proportion of human societies have chosen some form of gender segregation and it is one of the biggest criticisms westerners often level at non-western societies. In recent years there is evidence that western civilisation may be adopting increased gender segregation.
A lot of gender segregation in western countries is being driven by women who state that they often feel threatened by men, sometimes merely by their presence. Women continue to form many women-only organisations in western countries (such as gyms). This raises the interesting question about whether it was women who drove segregation in other societies. This would be interesting considering that gender segregation in non-western countries today is often claimed as principally disadvantaging women.
Feminists assert that men interrupt women more than women interrupt men in conversation. This notion is in dispute but if it is believed by women to be true then it may follow that women would prefer to talk to other women than men, which would further support the notion that women may naturally wish to increase gender segregation.
It may be reasonable for a society to permit gender segregation, but it must be on just and equal terms. Thus a society should permit both men-only and women-only organisations only if they are available on equal terms. A society should allow both or it should allow neither. Currently women in the west continue to enjoy uninterrupted access to women-only spaces and organisations while men are today prohibited from having men-only organisations.