Difference between revisions of "The Absurdity of Patriarchy"
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
=== When and where did it start? === |
=== When and where did it start? === |
||
− | If patriarchy existed and exists, it must have started somewhere.<ref>http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/20o6yv/how_can_i_convince_my_friend_that_horrible_acts/cg567wx</ref> |
+ | If patriarchy existed and exists, it must have started somewhere.<ref>http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/20o6yv/how_can_i_convince_my_friend_that_horrible_acts/cg567wx</ref> Be specific in providing information on where and when this occured. |
=== What written evidence did the purveyors of patriarchy in the past leave behind? === |
=== What written evidence did the purveyors of patriarchy in the past leave behind? === |
Revision as of 00:54, 18 March 2014
Patriarchy is a widely believed concept, especially among feminists. Patriarchy does not exist and never did exist.
Concrete Terms
Anyone believing in patriarchy should try to answer the following questions in concrete terms.
When and where did it start?
If patriarchy existed and exists, it must have started somewhere.[1] Be specific in providing information on where and when this occured.
What written evidence did the purveyors of patriarchy in the past leave behind?
If patriarchy existed in the past those maintaining the system would likely have had a theoretical basis for their activities and they would probably have written this done. Copies should survive.
The requirement here is for written evidence of the systematic and intended oppression of women. Documents (such as the Torah and Christian Bible) that describe ancient cultural practices that we may no longer observe or agree with are not sufficient.
Women who lived under patriarchy must have been aware of it. Did they leave any written records explicitely detailing the system used to oppress them?
Is it more prevalent in some cultures and periods of history than others? If so, which ones and when?
It is improbable that a movement would be equally expressed in all cultures and at all times. Thus it should be possible to describe cultures and periods of history in which the systematic and intentional oppression of women was more prevalent than others.
Did women ever try to rise up and fight it?
Fighting in this context need not mean physical violence. The women of a village (or an entire society), realising their plight, could choose to leave en masse with their children, fleeing their oppressors. Women could also fight the oppression of patriarchy by engaging in passive resistance. This would involve the women or a community (or a society) refusing the participate in their own oppression. They could collectively refuse to participate in any form of work that supported the society, and therefore their own oppression.
If so, what was the result?
Did any of these women succeed in shaking off patriarchy? For those that did not succeed, what was the punsishment? How many women where tortured, killed or exiled by the men of their society for the failed uprising? How many women were punished in other ways? When uprisings are suppressed it is common for the ruling class to publicise the the unsuccessful uprising and the punishments meted out so as to dissuade others.
Why did patriarchy ever permit female rulers?
Many societies had a minority of female rulers. Claims of patriarchy must explain why a patriarchal system would ever permit any female rulers. It must also explain why local female rulers were preferred over foreign male rulers as is historically documented.
References
<references>