Difference between revisions of "Curfew for men"

From Wiki 4 Men
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 17: Line 17:
 
* Only law abiding men would obey it. A man intent on harming women would go out and do so, unopposed by any men.
 
* Only law abiding men would obey it. A man intent on harming women would go out and do so, unopposed by any men.
 
* Most emergency services and after-hours workers are men. Having all these men home would increase risk for anyone on the streets.
 
* Most emergency services and after-hours workers are men. Having all these men home would increase risk for anyone on the streets.
  +
  +
== 2023 ==
  +
  +
[[Jameela Jamil]] has called for two hours a day when only women are allowed outside.
   
 
[[Category: Misandry]]
 
[[Category: Misandry]]

Revision as of 02:23, 30 March 2023

2016

https://www.feministcurrent.com/2016/01/07/its-time-to-consider-a-curfew-for-men/

2018

2021

A curfew for men would make women less safe, not more safe. This is because:

  • Only law abiding men would obey it. A man intent on harming women would go out and do so, unopposed by any men.
  • Most emergency services and after-hours workers are men. Having all these men home would increase risk for anyone on the streets.

2023

Jameela Jamil has called for two hours a day when only women are allowed outside.