Difference between revisions of "Weasel words"
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | [[File:2024-02-28-182941 651x266 scrot.png|thumb|Example of the use of Weasel words by [[Jess Phillips.]] |
+ | [[File:2024-02-28-182941 651x266 scrot.png|thumb|Example of the use of Weasel words by [[Jess Phillips]].]] |
+ | [[Weasel words]] are words and phrases aimed at creating an impression that specific and meaningful statements have been said when in fact only vague, ambiguous, or irrelevant claims have been communicated. Using weasel words may allow one to later deny any specific meaning if the statement is challenged, because the statement was never specific in the first place. Weasel words may be used in advertising, (popular) science, opinion pieces and political statements to mislead or disguise a biased view or unsubstantiated claim. |
||
− | {{Draft}} |
||
+ | |||
+ | Weasel words can harshen or over-state a controversial statement. An example of this is using terms like "somewhat" or "in most respects," which make a sentence more ambiguous than it would be without them. |
||
+ | |||
+ | Weasel words can take many different forms: |
||
+ | |||
+ | *Numerically vague expressions (for example, "some people", "experts", "many", "evidence suggests") |
||
+ | *Use of the passive voice to avoid specifying an authority (for example, "it is said") |
||
+ | *Adverbs that weaken (for example, "often", "probably") |
||
+ | *Illogical or irrelevant statements |
||
+ | *Use of vague or ambiguous euphemisms |
||
+ | *Use of grammatical devices such as qualifiers, negation and the subjunctive mood |
||
+ | *Use of the first person plural pronoun |
||
+ | *Vague generalizations |
||
+ | *Grouping together of only loosely related concepts |
||
+ | |||
+ | Opponents of [[men's rights]] often group loosely related concepts together in order to make an issue appear more common or severe than it really is. |
||
+ | |||
+ | == Examples == |
||
+ | |||
+ | <blockquote> |
||
+ | "This man is horrific, just like the millions of white men I could post about who beat or murdered women this week, but I'm not stupid enough to blame all white men for that, are you?"<ref>https://twitter.com/jessphillips/status/1762210504041251098</ref><ref>https://archive.is/dFXfg</ref> |
||
+ | </blockquote> |
||
+ | |||
+ | {{Featured}} |
||
{{Glossary}} |
{{Glossary}} |
||
+ | {{Wikipedia}} |
||
+ | |||
+ | == References == |
Latest revision as of 11:05, 28 February 2024
Weasel words are words and phrases aimed at creating an impression that specific and meaningful statements have been said when in fact only vague, ambiguous, or irrelevant claims have been communicated. Using weasel words may allow one to later deny any specific meaning if the statement is challenged, because the statement was never specific in the first place. Weasel words may be used in advertising, (popular) science, opinion pieces and political statements to mislead or disguise a biased view or unsubstantiated claim.
Weasel words can harshen or over-state a controversial statement. An example of this is using terms like "somewhat" or "in most respects," which make a sentence more ambiguous than it would be without them.
Weasel words can take many different forms:
- Numerically vague expressions (for example, "some people", "experts", "many", "evidence suggests")
- Use of the passive voice to avoid specifying an authority (for example, "it is said")
- Adverbs that weaken (for example, "often", "probably")
- Illogical or irrelevant statements
- Use of vague or ambiguous euphemisms
- Use of grammatical devices such as qualifiers, negation and the subjunctive mood
- Use of the first person plural pronoun
- Vague generalizations
- Grouping together of only loosely related concepts
Opponents of men's rights often group loosely related concepts together in order to make an issue appear more common or severe than it really is.
Examples
"This man is horrific, just like the millions of white men I could post about who beat or murdered women this week, but I'm not stupid enough to blame all white men for that, are you?"[1][2]
This article contains information imported from the English Wikipedia. In most cases the page history will have details. If you need information on the importation and have difficulty obtaining it please contact the site administrators.
Wikipedia shows a strong woke bias. Text copied over from Wikipedia can be corrected and improved.