Difference between revisions of "Talk:Domestic violence (Australia)"
(Created page with "ABS data shows that in 2014 of people who were 'family and domestic violence related assault victims', 28.284% were male. The data excludes Queensland due to different reporti...") |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
http://tinyurl.com/pvs7eo8 |
http://tinyurl.com/pvs7eo8 |
||
+ | |||
+ | [[User:Robert Brockway|Robert Brockway]] ([[User talk:Robert Brockway|talk]]) 23:47, 1 December 2015 (AEDT) |
Latest revision as of 12:47, 1 December 2015
ABS data shows that in 2014 of people who were 'family and domestic violence related assault victims', 28.284% were male. The data excludes Queensland due to different reporting standards. Amusingly I just saw a feminist try to use this document to discredit "one in three". Note the figure above refers to assaults relating to DV, not to DV itself which is broader. Anyone wanting to check my calculation can find the numbers I used under "Females Majority of Family And Domestic Violence-Related2 Assault Victims (Experimental Statistics)" (1157+807+3860+145+9261)/(4534+3482+10648+465+19488+1157+807+3860+145+9261)*100 = 28.284% http://tinyurl.com/pvs7eo8ABS data shows that in 2014 of people who were 'family and domestic violence related assault victims', 28.284% were male. The data excludes Queensland due to different reporting standards.
Amusingly I just saw a feminist try to use this document to discredit "one in three". Note the figure above refers to assaults relating to DV, not to DV itself which is broader.
Anyone wanting to check my calculation can find the numbers I used under "Females Majority of Family And Domestic Violence-Related2 Assault Victims (Experimental Statistics)" (1157+807+3860+145+9261)/(4534+3482+10648+465+19488+1157+807+3860+145+9261)*100 = 28.284%
Robert Brockway (talk) 23:47, 1 December 2015 (AEDT)