Feminist hypocricy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Created page with "Unfortunately modern feminism is hypocritical in many ways. This page lists some of the hypocracies maintained by feminists. == Exclusivity == Feminists argue that men shou..." |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Unfortunately modern feminism is hypocritical in many ways. This page lists some of the |
Unfortunately, modern feminism is hypocritical in many ways. This page lists some of the hypocrisies maintained by feminists. |
||
== Exclusivity == |
== Exclusivity == |
||
Feminists argue that men should not have exclusive places but that women may not. Recently the University of Sydney union voted against accepting ''BroSoc'' as a union affiliated club.<ref>http://honisoit.com/2014/09/board-blocks-brosoc/</ref> |
Feminists argue that men should not have exclusive places but that women may not. Recently the University of Sydney union voted against accepting ''BroSoc'' as a union affiliated club.<ref>http://honisoit.com/2014/09/board-blocks-brosoc/</ref><ref>http://www.altmedia.net.au/sydney-university-board-blocks-mens-society/98435</ref> This organisation would have run a ''men's shed'' on campus. In contrast the University of Sydney has several women-only organisations. |
||
== References == |
== References == |
||
<references> |
|||
Latest revision as of 12:12, 5 May 2020
Unfortunately, modern feminism is hypocritical in many ways. This page lists some of the hypocrisies maintained by feminists.
Exclusivity
Feminists argue that men should not have exclusive places but that women may not. Recently the University of Sydney union voted against accepting BroSoc as a union affiliated club.[1][2] This organisation would have run a men's shed on campus. In contrast the University of Sydney has several women-only organisations.