Difference between revisions of "Conscription"
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Caricature-1780-press_gang.jpg|thumb|Depiction of a [[Royal Navy]] [[press gang]], 1780.]] |
[[File:Caricature-1780-press_gang.jpg|thumb|Depiction of a [[Royal Navy]] [[press gang]], 1780.]] |
||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:GKVi3e-WQAArpIX.jpeg|thumb|[[Meme]] advocating for equality in conscription.]] |
||
[[Conscription]] (also called the draft in the United States) is the state-mandated enlistment of people in a national service, mainly a military service. With few exceptions conscription applies exclusively to men. |
[[Conscription]] (also called the draft in the United States) is the state-mandated enlistment of people in a national service, mainly a military service. With few exceptions conscription applies exclusively to men. |
||
Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
Conscription is controversial for a range of reasons, including conscientious objection to military engagements on religious or philosophical grounds; political objection, for example to service for a disliked government or unpopular war; sexism, in that historically men have been subject to the draft in the most cases; and ideological objection, for example, to a perceived violation of individual rights. Those conscripted may evade service, sometimes by leaving the country, and seeking asylum in another country. Some selection systems accommodate these attitudes by providing alternative service outside combat-operations roles or even outside the military, such as Siviilipalvelus (alternative civil service) in Finland, Zivildienst (compulsory community service) in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Several countries conscript male soldiers not only for armed forces, but also for paramilitary agencies, which are dedicated to police-like domestic only service like internal troops, border guards or non-combat rescue duties like civil defence. |
Conscription is controversial for a range of reasons, including conscientious objection to military engagements on religious or philosophical grounds; political objection, for example to service for a disliked government or unpopular war; sexism, in that historically men have been subject to the draft in the most cases; and ideological objection, for example, to a perceived violation of individual rights. Those conscripted may evade service, sometimes by leaving the country, and seeking asylum in another country. Some selection systems accommodate these attitudes by providing alternative service outside combat-operations roles or even outside the military, such as Siviilipalvelus (alternative civil service) in Finland, Zivildienst (compulsory community service) in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Several countries conscript male soldiers not only for armed forces, but also for paramilitary agencies, which are dedicated to police-like domestic only service like internal troops, border guards or non-combat rescue duties like civil defence. |
||
+ | As of 2025, many states are reintroducing conscription following several decades in which it was in decline. |
||
− | As of 2022, many states no longer conscript soldiers, relying instead upon professional militaries with volunteers. The ability to rely on such an arrangement, however, presupposes some degree of predictability with regard to both war-fighting requirements and the scope of hostilities. Many states that have abolished conscription still, therefore, reserve the power to resume conscription during wartime or times of crisis. States involved in wars or interstate rivalries are most likely to implement conscription, and democracies are less likely than autocracies to implement conscription. With a few exceptions, such as Singapore and Egypt, former British colonies are less likely to have conscription, as they are influenced by British anti-conscription norms that can be traced back to the English Civil War; the United Kingdom abolished conscription in 1960. |
||
+ | |||
+ | Many states that have abolished conscription still, therefore, reserve the power to resume conscription during wartime or times of crisis. States involved in wars or interstate rivalries are most likely to implement conscription, and democracies are less likely than autocracies to implement conscription. With a few exceptions, such as Singapore and Egypt, former British colonies are less likely to have conscription, as they are influenced by British anti-conscription norms that can be traced back to the English Civil War; the United Kingdom abolished conscription in 1960. |
||
* http://womenalliance.org/no-to-female-conscription |
* http://womenalliance.org/no-to-female-conscription |
||
* https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202001/22/WS5e27a9f7a310128217272b2b.html |
* https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202001/22/WS5e27a9f7a310128217272b2b.html |
||
+ | |||
+ | == Feminism == |
||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:2024-04-15-135423_597x133_scrot.png|400px]] |
||
+ | |||
+ | Feminists sometimes argue women should not be conscripted because they are needed to produced children. This argument is at odds with other feminist arguments and the birthrate in Western nations.<ref>https://twitter.com/michellmybell1/status/1779600355900150088</ref><ref>https://archive.is/wip/LUtB7</ref> |
||
+ | |||
+ | == Table == |
||
{| class="sortable wikitable" |
{| class="sortable wikitable" |
||
Line 30: | Line 42: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|Angola |
|Angola |
||
+ | |20-45 |
||
− | | |
||
− | | |
+ | |24 |
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 42: | Line 54: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|Armenia |
|Armenia |
||
+ | |18-27 |
||
− | | |
||
− | | |
+ | |24 |
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 221: | Line 233: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Indonesia |
||
− | | |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 227: | Line 239: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Iran |
||
− | | |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 233: | Line 245: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Israel |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Ivory Coast |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 239: | Line 257: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Jordan |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Kazakhstan |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 245: | Line 269: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Kuwait |
||
− | | |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 251: | Line 275: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Kyrgystan |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Laos |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Lithuania |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 258: | Line 293: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Mali |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Mexico |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 264: | Line 305: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Moldova |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Mongolia |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 270: | Line 317: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Moroco |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Mozanbique |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 276: | Line 329: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Myanmar |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Niger |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 282: | Line 341: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |North Korea |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Norway |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 288: | Line 353: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Paraguay |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Poland |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 294: | Line 365: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Portugal |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Qatar |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 300: | Line 377: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Russia |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |San Marino |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 306: | Line 389: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |San Tome and Principe |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Senegal |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 312: | Line 401: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Singapore |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Slovakia |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 318: | Line 413: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Somalia |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |South Korea |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 324: | Line 425: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |South Sudan |
||
− | |- |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Spain |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 331: | Line 437: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Sudan |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Sweden |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 337: | Line 449: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Switzerland |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Syria |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 343: | Line 461: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Taiwan |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Tajikistan |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 349: | Line 473: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Thailand |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Timor-Leste |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 355: | Line 485: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Tunisia |
||
− | | |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 361: | Line 491: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Turkey |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Turkmenistan |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Ukraine |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 368: | Line 509: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |United Arab Emirate |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |United States |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 374: | Line 521: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Uruguay |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Uzbekistan |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 380: | Line 533: | ||
| |
| |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | |Venezuela |
||
| |
| |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | | |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |Vietnam |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 402: | Line 561: | ||
{{Conscription}} |
{{Conscription}} |
||
+ | {{Draft}} |
||
{{Gynocentrism}} |
{{Gynocentrism}} |
||
{{Wikipedia}} |
{{Wikipedia}} |
Latest revision as of 00:45, 31 March 2025

Conscription (also called the draft in the United States) is the state-mandated enlistment of people in a national service, mainly a military service. With few exceptions conscription applies exclusively to men.
Conscription dates back to antiquity and it continues in some countries to the present day under various names. The modern system of near-universal national conscription for young men dates to the French Revolution in the 1790s, where it became the basis of a very large and powerful military. Most European nations later copied the system in peacetime, so that men at a certain age would serve 1–8 years on active duty and then transfer to the reserve force.
Conscription is controversial for a range of reasons, including conscientious objection to military engagements on religious or philosophical grounds; political objection, for example to service for a disliked government or unpopular war; sexism, in that historically men have been subject to the draft in the most cases; and ideological objection, for example, to a perceived violation of individual rights. Those conscripted may evade service, sometimes by leaving the country, and seeking asylum in another country. Some selection systems accommodate these attitudes by providing alternative service outside combat-operations roles or even outside the military, such as Siviilipalvelus (alternative civil service) in Finland, Zivildienst (compulsory community service) in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Several countries conscript male soldiers not only for armed forces, but also for paramilitary agencies, which are dedicated to police-like domestic only service like internal troops, border guards or non-combat rescue duties like civil defence.
As of 2025, many states are reintroducing conscription following several decades in which it was in decline.
Many states that have abolished conscription still, therefore, reserve the power to resume conscription during wartime or times of crisis. States involved in wars or interstate rivalries are most likely to implement conscription, and democracies are less likely than autocracies to implement conscription. With a few exceptions, such as Singapore and Egypt, former British colonies are less likely to have conscription, as they are influenced by British anti-conscription norms that can be traced back to the English Civil War; the United Kingdom abolished conscription in 1960.
Feminism
Feminists sometimes argue women should not be conscripted because they are needed to produced children. This argument is at odds with other feminist arguments and the birthrate in Western nations.[1][2]
Table
Country | Men | Women | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Age Range | Duration (months) | Age Range | Duration (months) | |
Algeria | 19-30 | 12 | ||
Angola | 20-45 | 24 | ||
Argentina | ||||
Armenia | 18-27 | 24 | ||
Austria | ||||
Azerbaijan | ||||
Belarus | ||||
Belize | ||||
Benin | ||||
Bhutan | ||||
Bolivia | ||||
Brazil | ||||
Cambodia | ||||
Cape Verde | ||||
Chad | ||||
Chile | ||||
China | ||||
Colombia | ||||
Congo | ||||
Cuba | ||||
Cyprus | ||||
Denmark | ||||
Egypt | ||||
El Salvador | ||||
Equatorial Guinea | ||||
Eritrea | ||||
Estonia | ||||
Ethiopia | ||||
Finland | ||||
Georgia | ||||
Greece | ||||
Guatamala | ||||
Guinea-Bissau | ||||
Indonesia | ||||
Iran | ||||
Israel | ||||
Ivory Coast | ||||
Jordan | ||||
Kazakhstan | ||||
Kuwait | ||||
Kyrgystan | ||||
Laos | ||||
Lithuania | ||||
Mali | ||||
Mexico | ||||
Moldova | ||||
Mongolia | ||||
Moroco | ||||
Mozanbique | ||||
Myanmar | ||||
Niger | ||||
North Korea | ||||
Norway | ||||
Paraguay | ||||
Poland | ||||
Portugal | ||||
Qatar | ||||
Russia | ||||
San Marino | ||||
San Tome and Principe | ||||
Senegal | ||||
Singapore | ||||
Slovakia | ||||
Somalia | ||||
South Korea | ||||
South Sudan | ||||
Spain | ||||
Sudan | ||||
Sweden | ||||
Switzerland | ||||
Syria | ||||
Taiwan | ||||
Tajikistan | ||||
Thailand | ||||
Timor-Leste | ||||
Tunisia | ||||
Turkey | ||||
Turkmenistan | ||||
Ukraine | ||||
United Arab Emirate | ||||
United States | ||||
Uruguay | ||||
Uzbekistan | ||||
Venezuela | ||||
Vietnam |
See Also
External Links
References
This is a draft article and so will not be published on A Voice for Men or appear in random article selections. Wiki4Men is looking for trustworthy editors that can turn draft articles in to featured articles. Information on how to apply is on the Main Page.
This article contains information imported from the English Wikipedia. In most cases the page history will have details. If you need information on the importation and have difficulty obtaining it please contact the site administrators.
Wikipedia shows a strong woke bias. Text copied over from Wikipedia can be corrected and improved.