Difference between revisions of "Prejudice plus power"
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Prejudice plus power]], sometimes alternatively described as |
+ | [[Prejudice plus power]], sometimes alternatively described as '''power plus prejudice''' or simple the '''power equation''', is a definition of [[sexism]] and [[racism]] used used in progressive politics.<ref>https://archive.is/roZqI</ref> |
[[Patricia Bidol-Padva]] first proposed this definition in a 1970 book, where she defined racism as "prejudice plus institutional power." According to this definition, two elements are required in order for racism to exist: racial prejudice, and social power to codify and enforce this prejudice into an entire society. Adherents write that while all people can be racially prejudiced, minorities are powerless and therefore only white people have the power to be racist. This definition is supported by the argument that power is responsible for the process of racialization and that social power is distributed in a zero-sum game. This view is commonly shared by social liberals and progressives. |
[[Patricia Bidol-Padva]] first proposed this definition in a 1970 book, where she defined racism as "prejudice plus institutional power." According to this definition, two elements are required in order for racism to exist: racial prejudice, and social power to codify and enforce this prejudice into an entire society. Adherents write that while all people can be racially prejudiced, minorities are powerless and therefore only white people have the power to be racist. This definition is supported by the argument that power is responsible for the process of racialization and that social power is distributed in a zero-sum game. This view is commonly shared by social liberals and progressives. |
||
| + | The equation is predicated on society existing as a strict hierarchy with white men at the top. To the extent that this hierarchy ever existed, people who believe this are living in the past.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-8YotBAU9E</ref> |
||
| − | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prejudice_plus_power |
||
| + | This pseudo-equation was only later applied to sexism.<ref>https://archive.is/roZqI</ref> |
||
| − | http://sjwiki.org/wiki/Prejudice_plus_power |
||
| + | {{Featured}} |
||
| − | People who believe this are living in the past.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-8YotBAU9E</ref> |
||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
{{Feminism}} |
{{Feminism}} |
||
{{Glossary}} |
{{Glossary}} |
||
| + | {{Politics}} |
||
{{Sexism}} |
{{Sexism}} |
||
{{Racism}} |
{{Racism}} |
||
| ⚫ | |||
== References == |
== References == |
||
Latest revision as of 16:05, 9 September 2024
Prejudice plus power, sometimes alternatively described as power plus prejudice or simple the power equation, is a definition of sexism and racism used used in progressive politics.[1]
Patricia Bidol-Padva first proposed this definition in a 1970 book, where she defined racism as "prejudice plus institutional power." According to this definition, two elements are required in order for racism to exist: racial prejudice, and social power to codify and enforce this prejudice into an entire society. Adherents write that while all people can be racially prejudiced, minorities are powerless and therefore only white people have the power to be racist. This definition is supported by the argument that power is responsible for the process of racialization and that social power is distributed in a zero-sum game. This view is commonly shared by social liberals and progressives.
The equation is predicated on society existing as a strict hierarchy with white men at the top. To the extent that this hierarchy ever existed, people who believe this are living in the past.[2]
This pseudo-equation was only later applied to sexism.[3]
This article contains information imported from the English Wikipedia. In most cases the page history will have details. If you need information on the importation and have difficulty obtaining it please contact the site administrators.
Wikipedia shows a strong woke bias. Text copied over from Wikipedia can be corrected and improved.