Difference between revisions of "Feminist hypocricy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Unfortunately modern feminism is hypocritical in many ways. This page lists some of the |
+ | Unfortunately, modern feminism is hypocritical in many ways. This page lists some of the hypocrisies maintained by feminists. |
== Exclusivity == |
== Exclusivity == |
||
| − | Feminists argue that men should not have exclusive places but that women may not. Recently the University of Sydney union voted against accepting ''BroSoc'' as a union affiliated club.<ref>http://honisoit.com/2014/09/board-blocks-brosoc/</ref><ref>http://www.altmedia.net.au/sydney-university-board-blocks-mens-society/98435</ref> This organisation would have run a ''men's shed'' on campus. In |
+ | Feminists argue that men should not have exclusive places but that women may not. Recently the University of Sydney union voted against accepting ''BroSoc'' as a union affiliated club.<ref>http://honisoit.com/2014/09/board-blocks-brosoc/</ref><ref>http://www.altmedia.net.au/sydney-university-board-blocks-mens-society/98435</ref> This organisation would have run a ''men's shed'' on campus. In contrast the University of Sydney has several women-only organisations. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== References == |
== References == |
||
| − | |||
| − | <references> |
||
Latest revision as of 12:12, 5 May 2020
Unfortunately, modern feminism is hypocritical in many ways. This page lists some of the hypocrisies maintained by feminists.
Exclusivity
Feminists argue that men should not have exclusive places but that women may not. Recently the University of Sydney union voted against accepting BroSoc as a union affiliated club.[1][2] This organisation would have run a men's shed on campus. In contrast the University of Sydney has several women-only organisations.