Difference between revisions of "Post-scarcity"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Post scarcity is not Socialist or Communist because socialism and communism both involve redistribution of weath and this is unnecessary in a post scarce world.") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Post scarcity]] is not Socialist or Communist because socialism and communism both involve redistribution of weath and this is unnecessary in a post scarce world. |
[[Post scarcity]] is not Socialist or Communist because socialism and communism both involve redistribution of weath and this is unnecessary in a post scarce world. |
||
| + | |||
| + | {{Post-scarcity}} |
||
Revision as of 02:34, 9 January 2024
Post scarcity is not Socialist or Communist because socialism and communism both involve redistribution of weath and this is unnecessary in a post scarce world.
Post scarcity is not Socialist or Communist because socialism and communism both involve redistribution of wealth and this is unnecessary in a post-scarce society. The redistribution of wealth is post-scarce society wouldn't even be meaningful. In a post-scarce society everyone has as much as they need. If wealth was redistributed in a manner which resulted in individuals or groups no longer having as much as they need then the society would no longer be post-scarce by definition.