Dunning–Kruger effect: Difference between revisions
Partial import from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect&oldid=1157992565 |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The [[Dunning–Kruger effect]] is a cognitive bias |
The [[Dunning–Kruger effect]] is a cognitive bias whereby people with low ability, expertise, or experience regarding a type of task or area of knowledge tend to overestimate their ability or knowledge. Some researchers also include the opposite effect for high performers: their tendency to underestimate their skills. In popular culture, the Dunning–Kruger effect is often misunderstood as a claim about general overconfidence of people with low intelligence instead of specific overconfidence of people unskilled at a particular task.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect&oldid=1157992565</ref> |
||
In the case of knowledge the Dunning–Kruger effect often manifests as certainty. A good example is the [[feminist historical narrative]] in which a high proportion of the population have very limited historical knowledge, believe it is absolutely true and yet cannot produce any evidence to support their positions. |
|||
== References == |
|||
[[Category: Featured Articles]] |
|||
[[Category: Psychology]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 15:25, 3 June 2023
The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias whereby people with low ability, expertise, or experience regarding a type of task or area of knowledge tend to overestimate their ability or knowledge. Some researchers also include the opposite effect for high performers: their tendency to underestimate their skills. In popular culture, the Dunning–Kruger effect is often misunderstood as a claim about general overconfidence of people with low intelligence instead of specific overconfidence of people unskilled at a particular task.[1]
In the case of knowledge the Dunning–Kruger effect often manifests as certainty. A good example is the feminist historical narrative in which a high proportion of the population have very limited historical knowledge, believe it is absolutely true and yet cannot produce any evidence to support their positions.