Difference between revisions of "Sperm count"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
They saw this coming for decades but early on most of the evidence was coming from fertility clinics so sceptics could dismiss it as they claimed it was an observer bias. Now it's not so easy to dismiss. |
They saw this coming for decades but early on most of the evidence was coming from fertility clinics so sceptics could dismiss it as they claimed it was an observer bias. Now it's not so easy to dismiss. |
||
| + | |||
| + | https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/study-explains-why-sperm-rates-have-dropped-50-per-cent/news-story/7eab2f14b2cc012fb23799f4283b03e6 |
||
[[Category: Biology]] |
[[Category: Biology]] |
||
Revision as of 15:40, 13 May 2023
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jul/29/infertility-crisis-sperm-counts-halved
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14647273.2021.1917778
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/16/health/male-sperm-count-problem.html
https://metro.co.uk/2022/11/16/sperm-count-decline-is-a-global-crisis-threatening-humanity-17767054/
They saw this coming for decades but early on most of the evidence was coming from fertility clinics so sceptics could dismiss it as they claimed it was an observer bias. Now it's not so easy to dismiss.