Difference between revisions of "Talk:Male genital mutilation"
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Even honest proponents of routine infant circumcision admit the procedure isn't medically necessary. Parental consent only applies to medical *treatment*. Since there is no medically identifiable problem no treatment is needed. Ergo parental consent is not sufficient. |
Even honest proponents of routine infant circumcision admit the procedure isn't medically necessary. Parental consent only applies to medical *treatment*. Since there is no medically identifiable problem no treatment is needed. Ergo parental consent is not sufficient. |
||
| + | |||
| + | Parental consent only applies to medical *treatment*. Even honest proponents of routine infant circumcision admit the circumcision is not a treatment. Since no treatment is required parental consent is not sufficient. Leave the babies alone. |
||
Revision as of 18:20, 11 March 2023
https://circumcision.org/men-circumcised-as-adults/
https://britishorthodox.org/glastonburyreview/issue-122-circumcision-and-the-copts/
https://www.circumcisionpro.co.uk/about-circumcision/history-of-circumcision/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17378847/
https://sciencenordic.com/denmark-gender-hiv/male-circumcision-leads-to-a-bad-sex-life/1371590
Even honest proponents of routine infant circumcision admit the procedure isn't medically necessary. Parental consent only applies to medical *treatment*. Since there is no medically identifiable problem no treatment is needed. Ergo parental consent is not sufficient.
Parental consent only applies to medical *treatment*. Even honest proponents of routine infant circumcision admit the circumcision is not a treatment. Since no treatment is required parental consent is not sufficient. Leave the babies alone.