Difference between revisions of "Women were property"
		
		
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
				
		
		
	
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| https://www.quora.com/In-what-year-did-women-cease-to-be-considered-private-property-of-their-husbands-in-England | https://www.quora.com/In-what-year-did-women-cease-to-be-considered-private-property-of-their-husbands-in-England | ||
| − | If men owned women, as feminists claim, then men were keeping women as chattel slaves, by definition. | + | If men owned women, as feminists claim, then men were keeping women as chattel slaves, by definition.  The ability to be able to buy and sell an item is a necessary condition to establish ownership but it alone is not sufficient. | 
| https://study.com/academy/lesson/chattel-slavery-definition-and-america.html | https://study.com/academy/lesson/chattel-slavery-definition-and-america.html | ||
Revision as of 23:53, 2 November 2022
https://psychcentral.com/lib/women-as-property-an-existential-challenge-in-psychotherapy-part-2
https://demetranyx.com/women-considered-property/
https://pftw.worldpeacefull.com/women-as-property/
https://www.dawn.com/news/1287775
If men owned women, as feminists claim, then men were keeping women as chattel slaves, by definition. The ability to be able to buy and sell an item is a necessary condition to establish ownership but it alone is not sufficient.
https://study.com/academy/lesson/chattel-slavery-definition-and-america.html
If you can't buy and sell something you don't own it.
Many people confuse Coverture with ownership.