Difference between revisions of "Women were property"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
https://www.quora.com/In-what-year-did-women-cease-to-be-considered-private-property-of-their-husbands-in-England |
https://www.quora.com/In-what-year-did-women-cease-to-be-considered-private-property-of-their-husbands-in-England |
||
− | If men owned women, as feminists claim, then men were keeping women as chattel slaves, by definition. |
+ | If men owned women, as feminists claim, then men were keeping women as chattel slaves, by definition. The ability to be able to buy and sell an item is a necessary condition to establish ownership but it alone is not sufficient. |
https://study.com/academy/lesson/chattel-slavery-definition-and-america.html |
https://study.com/academy/lesson/chattel-slavery-definition-and-america.html |
Revision as of 23:53, 2 November 2022
https://psychcentral.com/lib/women-as-property-an-existential-challenge-in-psychotherapy-part-2
https://demetranyx.com/women-considered-property/
https://pftw.worldpeacefull.com/women-as-property/
https://www.dawn.com/news/1287775
If men owned women, as feminists claim, then men were keeping women as chattel slaves, by definition. The ability to be able to buy and sell an item is a necessary condition to establish ownership but it alone is not sufficient.
https://study.com/academy/lesson/chattel-slavery-definition-and-america.html
If you can't buy and sell something you don't own it.
Many people confuse Coverture with ownership.