Difference between revisions of "Reciprocal partner violence"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Look under "Bi-directional vs. Uni-directional" |
Look under "Bi-directional vs. Uni-directional" |
||
− | The high rates of reciprocal IPV |
+ | The high rates of reciprocal IPV show that the Duluth model is wrong. IPV is not men trying to control women. |
Revision as of 09:20, 30 April 2017
This is PASK, one of the best sources we have, of course. I always describe it as the largest meta-analysis of DV/IPV research ever undertaken. It is not focussed on gender but rather analyses many variables. When it looks at gender it finds near gender parity in IPV and also finds a hight rate of reciprocal IPV, which is refers to as bi-directional.
Look under "Bi-directional vs. Uni-directional"
The high rates of reciprocal IPV show that the Duluth model is wrong. IPV is not men trying to control women.