Difference between revisions of "Casual misandry"
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=== Men can't maintain attentiveness as well as women === |
=== Men can't maintain attentiveness as well as women === |
||
| − | The Times of Israel |
+ | ==== The Times of Israel ==== |
''Speaking in her officer’s presence, she never once swiveled her head or removed her eyes from the screen. “Their powers of concentration are incredible,” the intelligence officer said, noting that very few males would be capable of maintaining the grueling attentiveness necessary to patrol a stretch of road for four straight hours.''<ref>http://www.timesofisrael.com/the-road-to-jerusalem-thats-off-limits-to-israels-leaders/</ref> |
''Speaking in her officer’s presence, she never once swiveled her head or removed her eyes from the screen. “Their powers of concentration are incredible,” the intelligence officer said, noting that very few males would be capable of maintaining the grueling attentiveness necessary to patrol a stretch of road for four straight hours.''<ref>http://www.timesofisrael.com/the-road-to-jerusalem-thats-off-limits-to-israels-leaders/</ref> |
||
Revision as of 04:56, 23 February 2014
Casual misandry is a phenomenon where unfounded negative claims are made about men as a group, or men as a group are insulted or put down. Both men and women can engage in casual misandry. Casual misandry is a more broad term than male bashing which is usually more direct in its attacks on men.
Examples of casual misandry are listed here. This list is not exclusive.
- Dismissing statements made by men as mansplaining
- Claiming a man has the manflu
- Slapping or striking a man while objecting to violence against women
- Claiming that men are obsolete
- Claiming that men or boys are stupid
- Claiming that women can multitask but men cannot or that women are significantly better at multitasking than men.
- Claiming a man is childlike without referencing specific behaviours
Examples
Men can't maintain attentiveness as well as women
The Times of Israel
Speaking in her officer’s presence, she never once swiveled her head or removed her eyes from the screen. “Their powers of concentration are incredible,” the intelligence officer said, noting that very few males would be capable of maintaining the grueling attentiveness necessary to patrol a stretch of road for four straight hours.[1]
In actuality men have routinely maintained vigilance for long periods of time during conflicts (and for other reasons) throughout history. Software Developers (85% men) routinely stare at screens without interruption for periods that are often much longer than four hours.
<references>