Women were property

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/rendezview/why-women-are-still-the-property-of-men/news-story/b18f0a4d456db6967e7c05f4f309604f

https://psychcentral.com/lib/women-as-property-an-existential-challenge-in-psychotherapy-part-2

https://www.quora.com/Why-have-women-historically-been-treated-as-property-What-did-our-ancestors-know-that-we-don-t-about-female-nature

https://demetranyx.com/women-considered-property/

https://pftw.worldpeacefull.com/women-as-property/

https://www.dawn.com/news/1287775

https://www.quora.com/Why-have-women-historically-been-treated-as-property-What-did-our-ancestors-know-that-we-don-t-about-female-nature

https://www.girlsaskguys.com/guys-behavior/q2834706-do-you-think-men-see-women-more-as-property-or-actual-people

https://www.quora.com/Were-women-really-property-of-their-husbands-or-is-that-a-misrepresentation-of-history

https://www.quora.com/In-what-year-did-women-cease-to-be-considered-private-property-of-their-husbands-in-England

If men owned women, as feminists claim, then men were keeping women as chattel slaves, by definition. The ability to be able to buy and sell an item is a necessary condition to establish ownership but it alone is not sufficient.

https://study.com/academy/lesson/chattel-slavery-definition-and-america.html

In many societies people could sell their children so an argument could be made that children *were* property.

The feminist historical narrative is so pervasive that even many nanti-feminists buy in to it.

Wife selling If you can't buy and sell something you don't own it.

Many people confuse Coverture with ownership.