Difference between revisions of "Marital debt"

From Wiki 4 Men
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
Contrary to claims of [[The Patriarchy]] leaders in the Christian Church in the Middle Ages postulated that a man could give his wife an orgasm and avoid orgasming himself:
 +
 +
<blockquote>
 +
Returning the debt to one's wife is nothing more than making your body available to
 +
her. Hence, one often renders the debt to his wife in such a way that he does not
 +
satisfy his pleasure, and conversely. Therefore, in the aforesaid case, I can so render
 +
the debt to my wife and wait in such a way until she satisfies her pleasure . . . . I can,
 +
if I wish, withdraw, not satisfying my pleasure, free of all sin, and not emitting my
 +
seed of propagation.<ref>https://resources.saylor.org/wwwresources/archived/site/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/The-Conjugal-Debt-and-Medieval-Canon-Law.pdf</ref>
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
== External Links ==
 +
 
* https://www.purplemotes.net/2015/05/03/matheolus-church-wife/
 
* https://www.purplemotes.net/2015/05/03/matheolus-church-wife/
 
* https://www.purplemotes.net/2017/11/26/husband-sexual-obligation/
 
* https://www.purplemotes.net/2017/11/26/husband-sexual-obligation/
 +
* https://brewminate.com/marriage-in-medieval-europe-sex-as-marital-debt/
 +
* https://ronconte.com/2015/12/18/the-marriage-debt-the-obligation-of-spouses-to-have-sex/
 +
* https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304418177900021
 +
* https://resources.saylor.org/wwwresources/archived/site/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/The-Conjugal-Debt-and-Medieval-Canon-Law.pdf
 +
 +
== References ==
  
 
[[Category:Draft Articles]]
 
[[Category:Draft Articles]]
 
[[Category:Marriage]]
 
[[Category:Marriage]]
 
[[Category:Sex]]
 
[[Category:Sex]]

Latest revision as of 12:20, 4 December 2019

Contrary to claims of The Patriarchy leaders in the Christian Church in the Middle Ages postulated that a man could give his wife an orgasm and avoid orgasming himself:

Returning the debt to one's wife is nothing more than making your body available to her. Hence, one often renders the debt to his wife in such a way that he does not satisfy his pleasure, and conversely. Therefore, in the aforesaid case, I can so render the debt to my wife and wait in such a way until she satisfies her pleasure . . . . I can, if I wish, withdraw, not satisfying my pleasure, free of all sin, and not emitting my seed of propagation.[1]



External Links

References

  1. https://resources.saylor.org/wwwresources/archived/site/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/The-Conjugal-Debt-and-Medieval-Canon-Law.pdf