Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From Wiki 4 Men
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
<h2 id="mp-tfa-h2" style="margin:0.5em; background:#cef2e0; font-family:inherit; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Purpose</h2>
  +
 
The purpose of the Wiki4Men is to provide a repository for information, studies, and research on men and boys and the broad range of issues affecting them.
 
The purpose of the Wiki4Men is to provide a repository for information, studies, and research on men and boys and the broad range of issues affecting them.
   
These days it seems you don't need to look far to see negativity focussed at men. This has been getting steadily worse. What is often known as [[casual misandry]] permeates western civilisation. Many men and women in the west (and elsewhere) will commonly make negative statements about men without apparently regarding this as a problem or being challenged by anyone else present. This problem has steadily deteriorated and we have now reached the point that books with titles such as ''Are Men Necessary?''<ref>http://www.amazon.com/Are-Men-Necessary-Sexes-Collide/dp/042521236X</ref> and [[The End of Men]]<ref>http://hannarosin.com/the-end-of-men/</ref> can be published without significant objection from the wider community.
+
These days it seems you don't need to look far to see negativity focused at men. What is often known as [[casual misandry]] permeates western civilisation where many men and women commonly make negative statements about men without apparently regarding this as a problem or being challenged by anyone else present. This problem has steadily deteriorated and we have now reached the point that books with titles such as ''Are Men Necessary?''<ref>http://www.amazon.com/Are-Men-Necessary-Sexes-Collide/dp/042521236X</ref> and ''[[The End of Men]]''<ref>http://hannarosin.com/the-end-of-men/</ref> can be published without significant objection from the wider community.
   
  +
Negative and inaccurate portrayals of men and boys has also permeated online knowledge repositories such as Wikipedia, where
In recent years the [[Men's Rights Movement]] has been expanding rapidly. From being a fringe movement as recently as 2010 it is rapidly going mainstream as increasing numbers of men and women are seeing [[misandry]] for what it is and objecting to it.
 
  +
where the bias is particularly evident. Wikipedia editors routinely write negative commentaries about men and admins enforce those commentaries while censoring counter-narratives that might show a less biased, more accurate picture.. Deplatforming. this is further reinforced by feminist editing gangs which end up silencing a male positive discourse and research on men.
 
Never the less, we still have a long way to go for the broader community to recognise that men as a group have legitimate [[concerns]].
 
   
 
Recently a ''Munk Debate'' was held entitled [[Men are Obsolete]]. This has brought hate speech against men in public discourse to an all new level. This site will publish factual information about men and women. The focus will be on positive information for and about men, but sometimes negative statements about women will be made (with citations). Some will no doubt be offended by this, but so be it. [[The gloves are off]].
 
Recently a ''Munk Debate'' was held entitled [[Men are Obsolete]]. This has brought hate speech against men in public discourse to an all new level. This site will publish factual information about men and women. The focus will be on positive information for and about men, but sometimes negative statements about women will be made (with citations). Some will no doubt be offended by this, but so be it. [[The gloves are off]].
Line 16: Line 17:
   
 
Wiki4Men is brought to you by [[Australian Men's Rights Association Inc]] and [[A Voice for Men]].
 
Wiki4Men is brought to you by [[Australian Men's Rights Association Inc]] and [[A Voice for Men]].
  +
  +
<h2 id="mp-tfa-h2" style="margin:0.5em; background:#cef2e0; font-family:inherit; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Welcome</h2>
  +
  +
We welcome and encourage contributions from supporters of men's equality and human rights. In order to do so, you will need to create an account and request edit permissions. Doing so indicates your agreement to comply with editorial policy and copyright policy.
  +
  +
We also welcome dissenting views and alternative interpretations on talk pages only (account required) and provided they are kept on topic (directly relevant to the associated article page) and civil. Non-compliant posts will summarily be deleted and those responsible will be blocked per policy.
  +
  +
Share and enjoy!
   
 
<h2 id="mp-tfa-h2" style="margin:0.5em; background:#cef2e0; font-family:inherit; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">External Links</h2>
 
<h2 id="mp-tfa-h2" style="margin:0.5em; background:#cef2e0; font-family:inherit; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">External Links</h2>

Revision as of 10:05, 20 March 2019

Purpose

The purpose of the Wiki4Men is to provide a repository for information, studies, and research on men and boys and the broad range of issues affecting them.

These days it seems you don't need to look far to see negativity focused at men. What is often known as casual misandry permeates western civilisation where many men and women commonly make negative statements about men without apparently regarding this as a problem or being challenged by anyone else present. This problem has steadily deteriorated and we have now reached the point that books with titles such as Are Men Necessary?[1] and The End of Men[2] can be published without significant objection from the wider community.

Negative and inaccurate portrayals of men and boys has also permeated online knowledge repositories such as Wikipedia, where where the bias is particularly evident. Wikipedia editors routinely write negative commentaries about men and admins enforce those commentaries while censoring counter-narratives that might show a less biased, more accurate picture.. Deplatforming. this is further reinforced by feminist editing gangs which end up silencing a male positive discourse and research on men.

Recently a Munk Debate was held entitled Men are Obsolete. This has brought hate speech against men in public discourse to an all new level. This site will publish factual information about men and women. The focus will be on positive information for and about men, but sometimes negative statements about women will be made (with citations). Some will no doubt be offended by this, but so be it. The gloves are off.

This site is intended to help readers recognise the positive side of masculinity that is often forgotten in the public discourse today and to dispel myths about men.

Look at the world around you and you will see the results of the labours and inventiveness of men. This does not down play the contributions of women, but in a world so eager to downplay and marginalise men and their accomplishments, it is necessary to set the record straight.

We are keepers of rationality and evidence based conclusions.

Wiki4Men is brought to you by Australian Men's Rights Association Inc and A Voice for Men.

Welcome

We welcome and encourage contributions from supporters of men's equality and human rights. In order to do so, you will need to create an account and request edit permissions. Doing so indicates your agreement to comply with editorial policy and copyright policy.

We also welcome dissenting views and alternative interpretations on talk pages only (account required) and provided they are kept on topic (directly relevant to the associated article page) and civil. Non-compliant posts will summarily be deleted and those responsible will be blocked per policy.

Share and enjoy!

External Links

References