Non-gynocentric traditionalist

From Wiki 4 Men
Revision as of 06:41, 23 March 2019 by Mundus imaginalis (talk | contribs) (Created page with "'''Non-Gynocentric Traditionalist''', coined by Peter Wright and Paul Elam, refers to an individual who advocates and proximity to "traditional" gender roles or labor division...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Non-Gynocentric Traditionalist, coined by Peter Wright and Paul Elam, refers to an individual who advocates and proximity to "traditional" gender roles or labor division between men and women. Such relationships are couple-centered as contrasted to woman-centered (gynocentrism), and are characterized by reciprocal devotion, status and value between men and women.

"The faultline can equally be discerned between two kinds of relationship agreements. ie. between gynocentric traditionalist and the non-gynocentric traditionalist. However both of them may choose to be married and have a family. We simply argue that one of those two different kinds of families has a great chance of producing more well-rounded children, individuals with agency and accountability.

The faultline, which rightly deserves to be there, is between those who follow the tenants of chivalry and romantic love, and those who don’t.

Non-gynocentric traditionalism might still be based on a role division as long as it’s an equitable one in terms of labor exertion and associated risks to health. That means role divisions can’t be based on chivalry or any other kind of male servitude. No amount of labor division can reciprocate or compensate for a man dying on the job for less in return.[....]

"What remains after gynocentrism is excised are benign aspects of traditional relationships such as a balanced labor division or labor balanced into different areas – she scrubs bathroom tiles while he mows grass. Women’s willingness to labor was common in times past where they regularly worked as butchers, bakers and candlestick-makers alongside their male counterparts.

In that cooperative atmosphere of mutual contribution, men and women were more attracted to marriage and belonging to a large extended family – with all members of the family looking out for the safety, and health of the family network.

Other aspects of traditionalism, too, deserve a mention, such as those of benefit to men. These include more father-son time, and an assumption of being able to enjoy male spaces such as male-only drinking saloons, sporting teams, pool halls, and fraternal organizations; Elks, Masons, Golden Fleece, and many others.[1]


references