Talk:Reciprocal partner violence - Revision history

Robert Brockway at 01:41, 17 December 2024

2024-12-17T01:41:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:41, 17 December 2024
Line 52:		Line 52:
	* http://www.forensicare.vic.gov.au/researcheducation-2/research-projects/complex-criminal-behaviour/youth-intimate-partner-violence-australian-sample/		* http://www.forensicare.vic.gov.au/researcheducation-2/research-projects/complex-criminal-behaviour/youth-intimate-partner-violence-australian-sample/
	* https://www.huffpost.com/entry/researcher-says-womens-in_b_222746		* https://www.huffpost.com/entry/researcher-says-womens-in_b_222746
			* https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3002073/

Robert Brockway at 03:13, 1 May 2023

2023-05-01T03:13:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:13, 1 May 2023
Line 32:		Line 32:
	* http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJPH.2005.079020		* http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJPH.2005.079020

			<blockquote>
	You may already know but in 1655 Massachusetts Bay Colony in North America decreed 'No man shall strike his wife nor any woman her husband' The punishment was a heavy fine or corporal punishment. Even
	in those days, they realised that domestic violence goes both ways. --Tim Lambert.		You may already know but in 1655 Massachusetts Bay Colony in North America decreed 'No man shall strike his wife nor any woman her husband' The punishment was a heavy fine or corporal punishment. Even in those days, they realised that domestic violence goes both ways. --Tim Lambert.
			</blockquote>

	"A man might snap one day and do serious damage to a woman."		"A man might snap one day and do serious damage to a woman."

Robert Brockway at 03:13, 1 May 2023

2023-05-01T03:13:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:13, 1 May 2023
Line 42:		Line 42:
	* http://www.franks.org/fr01060.htm		* http://www.franks.org/fr01060.htm
	* https://archive.ph/LO7p2		* https://archive.ph/LO7p2

			* https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/
			* http://familieslink.co.uk/download/sept07/Reciprocal%20violence%20AJPH.pdf
			* http://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=8145801d-8fc5-4d3e-931d-f0ffcf3bffbc&subId=298676
			* https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3384540/
			* https://www.hindawi.com/archive/2015/502703/
			* https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2005.079020
			* http://www.forensicare.vic.gov.au/researcheducation-2/research-projects/complex-criminal-behaviour/youth-intimate-partner-violence-australian-sample/
			* https://www.huffpost.com/entry/researcher-says-womens-in_b_222746

Robert Brockway: Robert Brockway moved page Talk:Reciprocal intimate partner violence to Talk:Reciprocal partner violence

2022-11-27T08:53:36Z

Robert Brockway moved page Talk:Reciprocal intimate partner violence to Talk:Reciprocal partner violence

← Older revision	Revision as of 08:53, 27 November 2022
(No difference)

Robert Brockway at 11:32, 21 August 2022

2022-08-21T11:32:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:32, 21 August 2022
Line 39:		Line 39:
	This tends to suggest that these relationships are characterised by the woman being violent towards the man until the man 'loses it' and does some real damage.		This tends to suggest that these relationships are characterised by the woman being violent towards the man until the man 'loses it' and does some real damage.
	Ignoring women's violence contributes to violence against women.		Ignoring women's violence contributes to violence against women.

			* http://www.franks.org/fr01060.htm
			* https://archive.ph/LO7p2

Robert Brockway at 08:53, 4 January 2021

2021-01-04T08:53:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:53, 4 January 2021
Line 34:		Line 34:
	You may already know but in 1655 Massachusetts Bay Colony in North America decreed 'No man shall strike his wife nor any woman her husband' The punishment was a heavy fine or corporal punishment. Even		You may already know but in 1655 Massachusetts Bay Colony in North America decreed 'No man shall strike his wife nor any woman her husband' The punishment was a heavy fine or corporal punishment. Even
	in those days, they realised that domestic violence goes both ways. --Tim Lambert.		in those days, they realised that domestic violence goes both ways. --Tim Lambert.

			"A man might snap one day and do serious damage to a woman."
			And if you look at the data for reciprocal IPV that is what you find. Both men and women in reciprocally violent relationships have a higher incidence of injuries than non-reciprocally violent relationships but the difference is greater for women.
			This tends to suggest that these relationships are characterised by the woman being violent towards the man until the man 'loses it' and does some real damage.
			Ignoring women's violence contributes to violence against women.

Robert Brockway at 12:51, 27 July 2020

2020-07-27T12:51:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:51, 27 July 2020
Line 31:		Line 31:
	* https://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/ID41E2.pdf		* https://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/ID41E2.pdf
	* http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJPH.2005.079020		* http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJPH.2005.079020

			You may already know but in 1655 Massachusetts Bay Colony in North America decreed 'No man shall strike his wife nor any woman her husband' The punishment was a heavy fine or corporal punishment. Even
			in those days, they realised that domestic violence goes both ways. --Tim Lambert.

Robert Brockway: Robert Brockway moved page Talk:Reciprocal IPV to Talk:Reciprocal intimate partner violence

2019-07-04T15:24:24Z

Robert Brockway moved page Talk:Reciprocal IPV to Talk:Reciprocal intimate partner violence

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:24, 4 July 2019
(No difference)

Robert Brockway at 15:23, 4 July 2019

2019-07-04T15:23:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 4 July 2019
Line 26:		Line 26:

	* http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39011224		* http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39011224
			* http://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=8145801d-8fc5-4d3e-931d-f0ffcf3bffbc&subId=298676
			* https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3384540/
			* https://www.hindawi.com/archive/2015/502703/
			* https://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/ID41E2.pdf
			* http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJPH.2005.079020

Robert Brockway: Created page with "* http://www.domesticviolenceresearch.org/domestic-violence-facts-and-statistics-at-a-glance/ This is PASK, one of the best sources we have, of course. I always describe it..."

2019-07-04T15:22:16Z

Created page with "* http://www.domesticviolenceresearch.org/domestic-violence-facts-and-statistics-at-a-glance/ This is PASK, one of the best sources we have, of course. I always describe it..."

New page

* http://www.domesticviolenceresearch.org/domestic-violence-facts-and-statistics-at-a-glance/

This is PASK, one of the best sources we have, of course. I always
describe it as the largest meta-analysis of DV/IPV research ever
undertaken. It is not focussed on gender but rather analyses many
variables. When it looks at gender it finds near gender parity in IPV and
also finds a hight rate of reciprocal IPV, which is refers to as
bi-directional.

Look under "Bi-directional vs. Uni-directional"

The high rates of reciprocal IPV show that the Duluth model is wrong. IPV is not men trying to control women.

* https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/

This study analysed data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. 'Longitudinal studies' are generally more compelling than the more common 'cross-sectional studies'.

The study examines differences in injury rates between reciprocal and non-reciprocal IPV. It finds that about half of all IPV is reciprocal. Note the similarity of rate to PASK. Interestingly women were more likely to admit to being perpetrators than their male partners were to nominate the women as perpetrators.

Injury rates are higher in reciprocal IPV than non-reciprocal IPV. This means that both men and women involved in reciprocal IPV are more likely to be injured. Organisations like '''White Ribbon Australia''' and '''Our Watch''' completely ignore reciprocal IPV as they push a gendered narrative. Government in Australia is influenced by the Duluth model which asserts that IPV occurs as a result of men attempting to control women through the use of violence. By ignoring the prevalence of reciprocal IPV the government, White Ribbon Australia and Our Watch are preventing effective interventions as their approach discounts the need to intervene with violent women. This will contribute to the continuation of reciprocal IPV and actually make it more likely that the women involved will be injured. By ignoring reciprocal IPV the government, White Ribbon Australia and Our Watch are contributing to violence against women.

* http://psychnews.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176%2Fpn.42.15.0031a
* http://pb.rcpsych.org/content/35/1/33.1

These pages summarise the previous link. The 2nd one also talks about a separate study of university students.

* http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39011224