Men are Obsolete (Munk debate) - Revision history

Robert Brockway at 09:51, 16 September 2025

2025-09-16T09:51:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:51, 16 September 2025
Line 6:		Line 6:

	The above Munk debate was followed by an article of the same name in [[TIME]] by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/</ref>		The above Munk debate was followed by an article of the same name in [[TIME]] by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/</ref>

			{{H2\|Misandry}}
			{{Misandry}}

	== See Also ==		== See Also ==
Line 17:		Line 20:
	*[https://omny.fm/shows/the-munk-debates-podcast/be-it-resolved-men-are-obsolete Audio of the Monk Debate]		*[https://omny.fm/shows/the-munk-debates-podcast/be-it-resolved-men-are-obsolete Audio of the Monk Debate]

			{{Events}}
⚫	== References ==
			{{Featured}}

		⚫	== References ==
	[[Category: Events]]
	[[Category: Featured Articles]]
	[[Category: Misandry]]

Robert Brockway at 05:57, 1 February 2023

2023-02-01T05:57:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:57, 1 February 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:
	The ''affirmative'' team was comprised of [[Hanna Rosin]] and [[Maureen Dowd]] with the negative team being comprised of [[Caitlin Moran]] and [[Camille Paglia]]. Monk debates poll the audience. If more than 50% vote in favour of the motion (for the pro side) then the motion is carried. In this case, the motion was carried and Monk declared that men are obsolete.<ref>https://munkdebates.com/debates/gender-in-the-21st-century</ref> Some commentators suggested that a number of men in the audience voted affirmatively to keep their female partners happy.		The ''affirmative'' team was comprised of [[Hanna Rosin]] and [[Maureen Dowd]] with the negative team being comprised of [[Caitlin Moran]] and [[Camille Paglia]]. Monk debates poll the audience. If more than 50% vote in favour of the motion (for the pro side) then the motion is carried. In this case, the motion was carried and Monk declared that men are obsolete.<ref>https://munkdebates.com/debates/gender-in-the-21st-century</ref> Some commentators suggested that a number of men in the audience voted affirmatively to keep their female partners happy.

	The above Munk debate was followed by an article of the same name in [[TIME]] by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/ ~~Men are Obsolete~~</ref>		The above Munk debate was followed by an article of the same name in [[TIME]] by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/</ref>

	== See Also ==		== See Also ==

Robert Brockway at 05:57, 1 February 2023

2023-02-01T05:57:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:57, 1 February 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:
	The ''affirmative'' team was comprised of [[Hanna Rosin]] and [[Maureen Dowd]] with the negative team being comprised of [[Caitlin Moran]] and [[Camille Paglia]]. Monk debates poll the audience. If more than 50% vote in favour of the motion (for the pro side) then the motion is carried. In this case, the motion was carried and Monk declared that men are obsolete.<ref>https://munkdebates.com/debates/gender-in-the-21st-century</ref> Some commentators suggested that a number of men in the audience voted affirmatively to keep their female partners happy.		The ''affirmative'' team was comprised of [[Hanna Rosin]] and [[Maureen Dowd]] with the negative team being comprised of [[Caitlin Moran]] and [[Camille Paglia]]. Monk debates poll the audience. If more than 50% vote in favour of the motion (for the pro side) then the motion is carried. In this case, the motion was carried and Monk declared that men are obsolete.<ref>https://munkdebates.com/debates/gender-in-the-21st-century</ref> Some commentators suggested that a number of men in the audience voted affirmatively to keep their female partners happy.

	The above Munk debate was followed by an of the same name in [[TIME]] by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/ Men are Obsolete</ref>		The above Munk debate was followed by an article of the same name in [[TIME]] by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/ Men are Obsolete</ref>

	== See Also ==		== See Also ==

Robert Brockway at 07:03, 1 December 2022

2022-12-01T07:03:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:03, 1 December 2022
Line 21:		Line 21:
	[[Category: Events]]		[[Category: Events]]
	[[Category: Featured Articles]]		[[Category: Featured Articles]]
			[[Category: Misandry]]

Robert Brockway: Robert Brockway moved page Men are Obsolete (Monk debate) to Men are Obsolete (Munk debate)

2022-11-30T03:57:03Z

Robert Brockway moved page Men are Obsolete (Monk debate) to Men are Obsolete (Munk debate)

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:57, 30 November 2022
(No difference)

Robert Brockway at 00:18, 30 November 2022

2022-11-30T00:18:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:18, 30 November 2022
Line 5:		Line 5:
	The ''affirmative'' team was comprised of [[Hanna Rosin]] and [[Maureen Dowd]] with the negative team being comprised of [[Caitlin Moran]] and [[Camille Paglia]]. Monk debates poll the audience. If more than 50% vote in favour of the motion (for the pro side) then the motion is carried. In this case, the motion was carried and Monk declared that men are obsolete.<ref>https://munkdebates.com/debates/gender-in-the-21st-century</ref> Some commentators suggested that a number of men in the audience voted affirmatively to keep their female partners happy.		The ''affirmative'' team was comprised of [[Hanna Rosin]] and [[Maureen Dowd]] with the negative team being comprised of [[Caitlin Moran]] and [[Camille Paglia]]. Monk debates poll the audience. If more than 50% vote in favour of the motion (for the pro side) then the motion is carried. In this case, the motion was carried and Monk declared that men are obsolete.<ref>https://munkdebates.com/debates/gender-in-the-21st-century</ref> Some commentators suggested that a number of men in the audience voted affirmatively to keep their female partners happy.

	The above Munk debate was followed by an ~~article in TIME by~~ the same name by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/ Men are Obsolete</ref>		The above Munk debate was followed by an of the same name in [[TIME]] by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/ Men are Obsolete</ref>

	== See Also ==		== See Also ==

Robert Brockway at 00:17, 30 November 2022

2022-11-30T00:17:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:17, 30 November 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	While the question was ''about'' men the organisers saw fit not to include any men in the debate. Apparently they ascribe to the notion that only women are entitled to discuss gender issues.		While the question was ''about'' men the organisers saw fit not to include any men in the debate. Apparently they ascribe to the notion that only women are entitled to discuss gender issues.

	The ''affirmative'' team was comprised of [[Hanna Rosin]] and [[Maureen Dowd]] with the negative team being comprised of [[Caitlin Moran]] and [[Camille Paglia]]. Monk debates poll the audience. If more than 50% vote in favour of the motion (for the pro side) then the motion is carried. In this case, the motion was carried and Monk declared that men are obsolete.<ref>https://munkdebates.com/debates/gender-in-the-21st-century</ref> Some commentators suggested that a number of men in the audience voted ~~affirmative~~ to keep their female partners happy.		The ''affirmative'' team was comprised of [[Hanna Rosin]] and [[Maureen Dowd]] with the negative team being comprised of [[Caitlin Moran]] and [[Camille Paglia]]. Monk debates poll the audience. If more than 50% vote in favour of the motion (for the pro side) then the motion is carried. In this case, the motion was carried and Monk declared that men are obsolete.<ref>https://munkdebates.com/debates/gender-in-the-21st-century</ref> Some commentators suggested that a number of men in the audience voted affirmatively to keep their female partners happy.

	The above Munk debate was followed by an article in TIME by the same name by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/ Men are Obsolete</ref>		The above Munk debate was followed by an article in TIME by the same name by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/ Men are Obsolete</ref>

Robert Brockway at 09:43, 11 December 2020

2020-12-11T09:43:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:43, 11 December 2020
Line 3:		Line 3:
	While the question was ''about'' men the organisers saw fit not to include any men in the debate. Apparently they ascribe to the notion that only women are entitled to discuss gender issues.		While the question was ''about'' men the organisers saw fit not to include any men in the debate. Apparently they ascribe to the notion that only women are entitled to discuss gender issues.

	The ''affirmative'' team was comprised of [[Hanna Rosin]] and [[Maureen Dowd]] with the negative team being comprised of [[Caitlin Moran]] and [[Camille Paglia]]. ~~The~~ ~~majority~~ of audience ~~members~~ ~~voted~~ ~~affirmative~~ ~~after~~ the ~~debate~~. Some commentators suggested that a number of men in the audience voted affirmative to keep their female partners happy.		The ''affirmative'' team was comprised of [[Hanna Rosin]] and [[Maureen Dowd]] with the negative team being comprised of [[Caitlin Moran]] and [[Camille Paglia]]. Monk debates poll the audience. If more than 50% vote in favour of the motion (for the pro side) then the motion is carried. In this case, the motion was carried and Monk declared that men are obsolete.<ref>https://munkdebates.com/debates/gender-in-the-21st-century</ref> Some commentators suggested that a number of men in the audience voted affirmative to keep their female partners happy.

	The above Munk debate was followed by an article in TIME by the same name by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/ Men are Obsolete</ref>		The above Munk debate was followed by an article in TIME by the same name by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/ Men are Obsolete</ref>

Robert Brockway at 09:40, 11 December 2020

2020-12-11T09:40:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:40, 11 December 2020
Line 15:		Line 15:
	*[https://munkdebates.com/debates/gender-in-the-21st-century Men are Obsolete at the Monk Debates]		*[https://munkdebates.com/debates/gender-in-the-21st-century Men are Obsolete at the Monk Debates]
	*[http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/government-tyranny/he-who-pays-the-piper-calls-the-tune-or-does-he/ He who pays the piper]		*[http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/government-tyranny/he-who-pays-the-piper-calls-the-tune-or-does-he/ He who pays the piper]
			*[https://omny.fm/shows/the-munk-debates-podcast/be-it-resolved-men-are-obsolete Audio of the Monk Debate]
	*[https://www.amazon.com.au/Are-Men-Obsolete-Debate-Gender/dp/1770894519 Men are Obsolete, on Amazon]

	== References ==		== References ==

Robert Brockway at 09:37, 11 December 2020

2020-12-11T09:37:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:37, 11 December 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This highly offensive notion was the title and subject of a Munk Debate in ~~2014~~.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/</ref>		This highly offensive notion was the title and subject of a Munk Debate in 2013.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/</ref>

	While the question was ''about'' men the organisers saw fit not to include any men in the debate. Apparently they ascribe to the notion that only women are entitled to discuss gender issues.		While the question was ''about'' men the organisers saw fit not to include any men in the debate. Apparently they ascribe to the notion that only women are entitled to discuss gender issues.